Waymo Will Get Driverless Car Due Diligence Report, but Little Time to Use It
An order Wednesday from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit could release evidence against Uber in a court battle that's speeding toward trial. An Uber spokesperson said that's not the case.
September 13, 2017 at 05:48 PM
4 minute read
Google's driverless car division, Waymo LLC, is getting its holy grail of discovery.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Wednesday rejected Anthony Levandowski's attempt to block production of a due diligence report in which he may or may not have acknowledged illegally downloading driverless car technology files from Google before leaving the company. Levandowski formed his own autonomous vehicle companies in 2016 and sold one of them to Uber for $680 million.
“Mr. Levandowski fails to articulate any persuasive reasons why disclosure of the Stroz report should be barred in this civil litigation, for the possibility of admissions against his interest is a valid function of civil discovery,” Judge Evan Wallach wrote for a unanimous panel in Waymo v. Uber Technologies. Judges Pauline Newman and Kara Stoll concurred.
Levandowski, who was fired from Uber earlier this year after asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, had argued that his communications with investigative firm Stroz Friedberg were privileged under the common interest doctrine because he and Uber had anticipated IP suits by Google when arranging the sale of Ottomotto LLC.
In a separate ruling authored by Newman, the court also declined to order the case into binding arbitration.
The upshot of the rulings is that Waymo will now receive a potentially explosive report potentially linking Levandowski's conduct to Uber, which has maintained that it never acquired or used any Waymo trade secrets. But Waymo has little time to use the report, as trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 10.
Michael Brophy, a partner at Withersworldwide whose practice includes IP litigation, said Waymo will have an interesting decision to make, since discovery is closed and the report is likely to point toward new chains of inquiry. “I imagine the plaintiffs are not going to want to push off the trial date,” he said. But “nonetheless, they would have pretty good grounds” for postponement if necessary to take more discovery.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOpenAI Hires First Compliance Chief, Snagging Uber's Scott Schools
Meta Hit With Class Action for Allegedly Using Pirated Books to Train AI Models
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250