Phila. Injury Firm Sues Morgan & Morgan for False Advertising
Its commercials pepper daytime television and its billboards can be seen on highways in the Philadelphia area, but the personal injury firm of Morgan &…
September 26, 2017 at 06:23 PM
8 minute read
Its commercials pepper daytime television and its billboards can be seen on highways in the Philadelphia area, but the personal injury firm of Morgan & Morgan has now attracted some unwanted attention.
The Philadelphia law firm of Rosenbaum & Associates has sued Orlando-based Morgan & Morgan and its principals in federal court, claiming the firm falsely advertises that it represents clients in Philadelphia and the surrounding area, when it only has one attorney in Pennsylvania with “little or no experience in handling personal injury matters,” according to the complaint.
“Defendants' advertising campaign did, and continues to, mislead the consumer that they actively litigate claims in Pennsylvania when in fact their representation of personal injury claims is nonexistent or minimal,” Rosenbaum's complaint said.
Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan did not return a call seeking comment Tuesday. The firm has not yet responded in court filings.
Rosenbaum, which also has an active advertising presence with commercials and billboards, claimed in its complaint that the Morgan firm's advertisements lead potential clients to believe that John Morgan would be personally involved in their cases.
The complaint alleged Morgan & Morgan's ads claim that the firm is “not a referral service” but fail to inform the consumer that their case will be referred to another firm.
Rosenbaum also argued in the complaint that Morgan & Morgan is bad for the Philadelphia legal market. “The purpose of defendants' significant advertising budget is to undermine the competition by overwhelming the consumers in the Philadelphia market with false and misleading information,” the complaint said.
This is a developing story.
Its commercials pepper daytime television and its billboards can be seen on highways in the Philadelphia area, but the personal injury firm of
The Philadelphia law firm of Rosenbaum & Associates has sued Orlando-based
“Defendants' advertising campaign did, and continues to, mislead the consumer that they actively litigate claims in Pennsylvania when in fact their representation of personal injury claims is nonexistent or minimal,” Rosenbaum's complaint said.
Rosenbaum, which also has an active advertising presence with commercials and billboards, claimed in its complaint that the Morgan firm's advertisements lead potential clients to believe that John Morgan would be personally involved in their cases.
The complaint alleged
Rosenbaum also argued in the complaint that
This is a developing story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAre Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readAI Might Kill Off the Billable Hour Someday, But It Will Be a Slow Death
Big Law Has 'False Sense of Security' as Clients Depart for Midsized Firms
Trending Stories
- 1Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 3Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 4CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 5Deluge of Trump-Leary Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250