How Much Money Will Uber's Next Legal Chief Make?
The next top attorney at troubled Uber could bring home a pretty nice paycheck.
October 04, 2017 at 04:00 PM
18 minute read
Uber headquarters, located at 1455 Market St. in San Francisco, CA. Photo Credit: Jason Doiy
Salle Yoo, Uber Technologies Inc.'s head of legal announced in September, one week after Dara Khosrowshahi stepped in as the company's new CEO, that she plans to leave the troubled ride-hailing giant once a new general counsel is in place. Days later, reports surfaced that former Salesforce.com Inc. chief legal officer and chief of corporate and government affairs Burke Norton was being considered as the replacement for Yoo, who has been with the company for five years.
There's no certainty yet that Norton will be the next top lawyer at Uber. But the search for a new legal boss at the company–who will start the job with plenty of legal and compliance challenges on his or her plate–has underscored the question of how much compensation a new legal leader at the company is poised to pocket.
Valuable Players
If Norton is in fact called on to lead the legal department, Uber could have to fork over a hefty chunk of change in order to match his salary at cloud computing company Salesforce.
Norton's most recent annual base salary with the San Francisco-based company was $750,000–a number that had steadily climbed in recent years, according to Salesforce proxy statements.
This base salary is significantly higher than what recruiters and executive compensation experts interviewed by Corporate Counsel expect Yoo makes in her current position and what they believe another incoming GC could stand to make.
An Uber spokesperson declined to comment, saying the company cannot comment on speculation regarding employee pay or rumors about its search for a new general counsel.
Compensation data provided by legal recruiting firm BarkerGilmore and Equilar Inc. indicates that a general counsel of a private company with annual revenue between $5 billion and $15 billion would make a base salary of $515,000, on average. (Uber reported roughly $6.5 billion in revenue last year.) But John Gilmore, co-founder and managing partner of BarkerGilmore, said that “these compensation reports go out the window when a company wants someone specific and that person has the leverage when it comes to negotiating.”
Gilmore added, “Based on the issues that will be in front of him at Uber, [Norton] is not going to go cheap. He led Salesforce through extensive growth, and is probably motivated to relive this challenge.”
Norton's base pay at Salesforce has grown at a healthy clip in recent years. His salary went from $650,000 in 2015 to $700,000 the following year and jumped another $50,000 in 2017.
Sources place Yoo's target bonus at 100 percent, which would be in line with what companies with similar revenue offer their top lawyers.
In April, Norton received a performance-related bonus of $562,500 for fiscal year 2017, according to a Salesforce filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Even so, Julie Brush, founding partner at Bay Area-based legal search consultancy Solutus Legal, said she “would be surprised if Uber equalled the base comp he had at [Salesforce.]”
She noted Norton's salary will also depend on the scope of the role he takes on.
According to news site Skift, which first reported that Norton was being considered for the Uber job, his exact title there would be “fluid, ranging from chief legal officer to variations of that.”
Generally, GCs of startups in Silicon Valley can make anywhere between $250,000 and $300,000, according to Brush, but she thinks the incoming GC could make $350,000. She predicted Yoo's salary might have started out in the range of $250,000 to $275,000 when she joined as the company's first in-house lawyer in May 2012.
Regardless of base pay, Brush said– and other experts agree–that “the play here is in the value of the stock.”
Based on her knowledge of other companies' practices in Silicon Valley, Brush estimated that Yoo's ownership in Uber fell somewhere between 0.5 percent and 0.65 percent–0.7 percent at the highest–when she joined the company, although she expects those shares have been diluted significantly since.
Some of the other experts interviewed for this article expect that Yoo's stake in the company could have been as high as 1.5 percent. Brush, on the other hand, said she would be “shocked” if Yoo's stake in Uber was even 1 percent.
It's unclear how much equity Yoo will be losing out on if she leaves before the company goes public. Khosrowshahi indicated in late August he is planning an IPO for Uber in the next 18 to 36 months. One Uber investor has predicted the company could be worth more than $100 billion in the next couple of years.
Attracting the Right Talent
Uber's new head of legal will join a company facing everything from a criminal probe into Uber's “Greyball” program to an ongoing court battle with Google Inc.'s driverless car division. Money could serve as a big incentive in attracting a candidate with the ability and desire to take on these challenges.
“I would really look for somebody with some maturity and some gravitas and a really, really stiff spine who is unafraid of standing up and saying 'no' for the incoming general counsel,” said Steve John, principal and founder of attorney executive search firm Steven John & Associates. “They will be best served if they've got a new general counsel who understands crisis management and who really understands how to navigate huge public and government relations issues.”
In order to bring in someone of that caliber, John added: “I think they're going to have to use money as a luring mechanism, because anybody looking at that opportunity is going to see high risk with the possibility of a very short tenure.”
For Uber, tempting the right candidate may mean handing over a base salary that sources said ranges anywhere from $275,000 to $515,000. And the ride-hailing company should also likely expect a push for equity, they noted.
“This is really a stock play for somebody who would want to walk in the door and take over this role,” according to Brush. “And if they do hire somebody who has strong general counsel experience, which is really somebody who I think they need to hire, that person's going to want the stock upside.”
The numbers would understandably be impacted by where the candidate is coming from, Brush added. “If they pull somebody from a big, high profile technology company, then they're going to have to lean in on the costs and on the stock,” she said. “If they hire somebody who's a little lower profile, then they're going to be able to have some more flexibility on that.”
And it wouldn't be unexpected for the incoming lead lawyer to get a signing bonus, Brush said, which could “bridge the gap” for a potential hire who needs a bit more incentive to commit.
Compensation Packages at Uber
Outside the top echelons of the legal department, pay looks a little different for Uber's attorneys. Base salary for senior counsel ranges from roughly $163,000 to nearly $200,000, according to statistics posted on Glassdoor. According to the website, total compensation for senior counsel can reach as high as $292,000.
While the compensation stats for others in the legal department understandably differ from Yoo's, based on an attorney's rank within the company, the basic premise that equity is the most significant piece of the compensation puzzle – which is common among Silicon Valley companies – seems to hold true at Uber.
For one former Uber in-house attorney, who spoke on condition of anonymity to preserve relationships within the company, this was certainly the case. “The salary [when I was hired] was significantly lower than what I would get paid at a law firm. Also significantly lower than what I would get paid at a more established tech company, like Twitter, Google or Facebook,” the attorney said. “But they're able to attract good people based on the equity.”
As recently as 2016, the equity package amounts offered to potential hires were decreased “substantially,” which made bringing in new attorneys somewhat difficult, the former Uber in-house lawyer said. “We still got great new attorneys, but it was a lot harder to hire the people we wanted to hire because of that restriction,” the attorney explained. “I was told again and again that people weren't happy with their equity packages and were rejecting offers on that basis.”
The attorney added that improvements seem to have been made in 2017 with respect to equity offers, though the source doesn't have a sense of “how good the adjustments were.”
Another compensation shift for the legal department came back in 2015 when the company, instead of issuing stock options, began issuing restricted stock units, which have become more common in Silicon Valley in the last decade. RSUs are shares of common stock subject to vesting and other restrictions.
“That was, you know, a big change in the compensation structure. Not just for attorneys, but for all employees,” the former in-house attorney noted. “When they switched to RSUs, I think the amount of equity that the average attorney – and probably average employee – was getting was less.”
Uber headquarters, located at 1455 Market St. in San Francisco, CA. Photo Credit: Jason Doiy
Salle Yoo, Uber Technologies Inc.'s head of legal announced in September, one week after Dara Khosrowshahi stepped in as the company's new CEO, that she plans to leave the troubled ride-hailing giant once a new general counsel is in place. Days later, reports surfaced that former
There's no certainty yet that Norton will be the next top lawyer at Uber. But the search for a new legal boss at the company–who will start the job with plenty of legal and compliance challenges on his or her plate–has underscored the question of how much compensation a new legal leader at the company is poised to pocket.
Valuable Players
If Norton is in fact called on to lead the legal department, Uber could have to fork over a hefty chunk of change in order to match his salary at cloud computing company Salesforce.
Norton's most recent annual base salary with the San Francisco-based company was $750,000–a number that had steadily climbed in recent years, according to Salesforce proxy statements.
This base salary is significantly higher than what recruiters and executive compensation experts interviewed by Corporate Counsel expect Yoo makes in her current position and what they believe another incoming GC could stand to make.
An Uber spokesperson declined to comment, saying the company cannot comment on speculation regarding employee pay or rumors about its search for a new general counsel.
Compensation data provided by legal recruiting firm BarkerGilmore and Equilar Inc. indicates that a general counsel of a private company with annual revenue between $5 billion and $15 billion would make a base salary of $515,000, on average. (Uber reported roughly $6.5 billion in revenue last year.) But John Gilmore, co-founder and managing partner of BarkerGilmore, said that “these compensation reports go out the window when a company wants someone specific and that person has the leverage when it comes to negotiating.”
Gilmore added, “Based on the issues that will be in front of him at Uber, [Norton] is not going to go cheap. He led Salesforce through extensive growth, and is probably motivated to relive this challenge.”
Norton's base pay at Salesforce has grown at a healthy clip in recent years. His salary went from $650,000 in 2015 to $700,000 the following year and jumped another $50,000 in 2017.
Sources place Yoo's target bonus at 100 percent, which would be in line with what companies with similar revenue offer their top lawyers.
In April, Norton received a performance-related bonus of $562,500 for fiscal year 2017, according to a Salesforce filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Even so, Julie Brush, founding partner at Bay Area-based legal search consultancy Solutus Legal, said she “would be surprised if Uber equalled the base comp he had at [Salesforce.]”
She noted Norton's salary will also depend on the scope of the role he takes on.
According to news site Skift, which first reported that Norton was being considered for the Uber job, his exact title there would be “fluid, ranging from chief legal officer to variations of that.”
Generally, GCs of startups in Silicon Valley can make anywhere between $250,000 and $300,000, according to Brush, but she thinks the incoming GC could make $350,000. She predicted Yoo's salary might have started out in the range of $250,000 to $275,000 when she joined as the company's first in-house lawyer in May 2012.
Regardless of base pay, Brush said– and other experts agree–that “the play here is in the value of the stock.”
Based on her knowledge of other companies' practices in Silicon Valley, Brush estimated that Yoo's ownership in Uber fell somewhere between 0.5 percent and 0.65 percent–0.7 percent at the highest–when she joined the company, although she expects those shares have been diluted significantly since.
Some of the other experts interviewed for this article expect that Yoo's stake in the company could have been as high as 1.5 percent. Brush, on the other hand, said she would be “shocked” if Yoo's stake in Uber was even 1 percent.
It's unclear how much equity Yoo will be losing out on if she leaves before the company goes public. Khosrowshahi indicated in late August he is planning an IPO for Uber in the next 18 to 36 months. One Uber investor has predicted the company could be worth more than $100 billion in the next couple of years.
Attracting the Right Talent
Uber's new head of legal will join a company facing everything from a criminal probe into Uber's “Greyball” program to an ongoing court battle with
“I would really look for somebody with some maturity and some gravitas and a really, really stiff spine who is unafraid of standing up and saying 'no' for the incoming general counsel,” said Steve John, principal and founder of attorney executive search firm Steven John & Associates. “They will be best served if they've got a new general counsel who understands crisis management and who really understands how to navigate huge public and government relations issues.”
In order to bring in someone of that caliber, John added: “I think they're going to have to use money as a luring mechanism, because anybody looking at that opportunity is going to see high risk with the possibility of a very short tenure.”
For Uber, tempting the right candidate may mean handing over a base salary that sources said ranges anywhere from $275,000 to $515,000. And the ride-hailing company should also likely expect a push for equity, they noted.
“This is really a stock play for somebody who would want to walk in the door and take over this role,” according to Brush. “And if they do hire somebody who has strong general counsel experience, which is really somebody who I think they need to hire, that person's going to want the stock upside.”
The numbers would understandably be impacted by where the candidate is coming from, Brush added. “If they pull somebody from a big, high profile technology company, then they're going to have to lean in on the costs and on the stock,” she said. “If they hire somebody who's a little lower profile, then they're going to be able to have some more flexibility on that.”
And it wouldn't be unexpected for the incoming lead lawyer to get a signing bonus, Brush said, which could “bridge the gap” for a potential hire who needs a bit more incentive to commit.
Compensation Packages at Uber
Outside the top echelons of the legal department, pay looks a little different for Uber's attorneys. Base salary for senior counsel ranges from roughly $163,000 to nearly $200,000, according to statistics posted on Glassdoor. According to the website, total compensation for senior counsel can reach as high as $292,000.
While the compensation stats for others in the legal department understandably differ from Yoo's, based on an attorney's rank within the company, the basic premise that equity is the most significant piece of the compensation puzzle – which is common among Silicon Valley companies – seems to hold true at Uber.
For one former Uber in-house attorney, who spoke on condition of anonymity to preserve relationships within the company, this was certainly the case. “The salary [when I was hired] was significantly lower than what I would get paid at a law firm. Also significantly lower than what I would get paid at a more established tech company, like Twitter,
As recently as 2016, the equity package amounts offered to potential hires were decreased “substantially,” which made bringing in new attorneys somewhat difficult, the former Uber in-house lawyer said. “We still got great new attorneys, but it was a lot harder to hire the people we wanted to hire because of that restriction,” the attorney explained. “I was told again and again that people weren't happy with their equity packages and were rejecting offers on that basis.”
The attorney added that improvements seem to have been made in 2017 with respect to equity offers, though the source doesn't have a sense of “how good the adjustments were.”
Another compensation shift for the legal department came back in 2015 when the company, instead of issuing stock options, began issuing restricted stock units, which have become more common in Silicon Valley in the last decade. RSUs are shares of common stock subject to vesting and other restrictions.
“That was, you know, a big change in the compensation structure. Not just for attorneys, but for all employees,” the former in-house attorney noted. “When they switched to RSUs, I think the amount of equity that the average attorney – and probably average employee – was getting was less.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250