The Complexities of Celebrity Taxes
Once in a while, we hear in the news that a celebrity owes the IRS millions of dollars or is facing criminal prosecution for failure to pay taxes. Celebrities…
October 16, 2017 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Once in a while, we hear in the news that a celebrity owes the IRS millions of dollars or is facing criminal prosecution for failure to pay taxes. Celebrities are public figures, so if the press finds out about an extravagant lifestyle of a high-profile celebrity and that individual files a tax return reporting modest income, the authorities may take a closer look. Celebrity tax planning can be very complex, but even with the best advisors, there are many unclear answers.
Inside Counsel sat down with Brad Cohen, partner at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, who's practice emphasizes business planning related to complex corporate and partnership transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, financing and business succession planning, income tax planning, and estate tax planning, all on an integrated basis.
Oftentimes, celebrities are working in multiple locations within and outside the United States, which provides tax complexities and opportunities that the IRS likes to keep an eye on. The financial lives and contracts for services of celebrities often involve many different streams of income, many of which are contingent upon successes of an entertainment property.
“For example, copyrights, royalties, back end participations, equity; each have their own unique tax rules and planning opportunities,” explained Cohen. “This provides the celebrity advisors with lots of places for interpretation and misinterpretation. In addition, many celebrities loan out their services through wholly owned personal services corporations. This adds additional tax opportunities and hazards.”
The IRS never misses the opportunity to use unpaid celebrity taxes as a promotional tool to improve tax compliance, according to Cohen. The taxing authorities have limited resources and if they can publish a celebrity's tax missteps, they hope that this will deter the rest of us mortals from mirroring that bad behavior.
“When celebrities come up short on their taxes, the world takes notice,” he said. “Headlines start running in the press that proclaim a star's money or legal troubles and they often wind up on lists in the gossip columns and online.”
If the press picks up on an extravagant lifestyle of a high-profile singer, actor, athlete, or other celebrity and that individual files a tax return on which they report an inadequate income, the IRS or other taxing authorities may take a closer look. The IRS and various state agencies are readers and watch television. If their suspicions are aroused, they may take a closer look. Cohen's advice is to strongly discourage the celebrities from appearing on shows like, “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous”.
“Despite rumors to the contrary, the taxing authorities are human beings,” he explained. “They want to touch paper that the celebrities touch; and if they can get a face-to-face interview, that could be a career highlight.”
The financial lives and contracts of celebrities are complicated, often involve many different streams of income, many of which are deferred and contingent upon successes of an entertainment property, per Cohen. Celebrities read the headlines describing how much money they are making on a project and sometimes mistakenly believe that the reported gross compensation is available for their consumption. However, after payment to agents, managers, business managers and entertainment lawyers there is only a modest amount of cash available to maintain their extravagant lifestyles and pay their taxes.
“Celebrities frequently have enormous personal lifestyles expenses that enhance their public/professional image,” he said. “Examples of these expenses are entertainment, private aircraft, security and wardrobe. Often, their professionals will attempt to deduct those expense from their income. Not surprisingly, the taxing authorities are obsessed with auditing those expenses and often seek to partially or wholly disallow the expenses as personal and not business.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/25/7d/54707a6b409ca288c02206e94940/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-767x633.jpg)
Compliance With EU AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect
![State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/296/2020/08/lumber-construction-resized.jpg)
State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-Day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
3 minute read![Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bd/6e/a784bcf54b9d940dfa4f2802d343/gwynne-wilcox-767x633.jpg)
Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
![GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/08/securities-and-exchange-commission-building-sec-2014-10_358719-767x633-1.jpg)
GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250