The Complexities of Celebrity Taxes
Once in a while, we hear in the news that a celebrity owes the IRS millions of dollars or is facing criminal prosecution for failure to pay taxes. Celebrities…
October 16, 2017 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Once in a while, we hear in the news that a celebrity owes the IRS millions of dollars or is facing criminal prosecution for failure to pay taxes. Celebrities are public figures, so if the press finds out about an extravagant lifestyle of a high-profile celebrity and that individual files a tax return reporting modest income, the authorities may take a closer look. Celebrity tax planning can be very complex, but even with the best advisors, there are many unclear answers.
Inside Counsel sat down with Brad Cohen, partner at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, who's practice emphasizes business planning related to complex corporate and partnership transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, financing and business succession planning, income tax planning, and estate tax planning, all on an integrated basis.
Oftentimes, celebrities are working in multiple locations within and outside the United States, which provides tax complexities and opportunities that the IRS likes to keep an eye on. The financial lives and contracts for services of celebrities often involve many different streams of income, many of which are contingent upon successes of an entertainment property.
“For example, copyrights, royalties, back end participations, equity; each have their own unique tax rules and planning opportunities,” explained Cohen. “This provides the celebrity advisors with lots of places for interpretation and misinterpretation. In addition, many celebrities loan out their services through wholly owned personal services corporations. This adds additional tax opportunities and hazards.”
The IRS never misses the opportunity to use unpaid celebrity taxes as a promotional tool to improve tax compliance, according to Cohen. The taxing authorities have limited resources and if they can publish a celebrity's tax missteps, they hope that this will deter the rest of us mortals from mirroring that bad behavior.
“When celebrities come up short on their taxes, the world takes notice,” he said. “Headlines start running in the press that proclaim a star's money or legal troubles and they often wind up on lists in the gossip columns and online.”
If the press picks up on an extravagant lifestyle of a high-profile singer, actor, athlete, or other celebrity and that individual files a tax return on which they report an inadequate income, the IRS or other taxing authorities may take a closer look. The IRS and various state agencies are readers and watch television. If their suspicions are aroused, they may take a closer look. Cohen's advice is to strongly discourage the celebrities from appearing on shows like, “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous”.
“Despite rumors to the contrary, the taxing authorities are human beings,” he explained. “They want to touch paper that the celebrities touch; and if they can get a face-to-face interview, that could be a career highlight.”
The financial lives and contracts of celebrities are complicated, often involve many different streams of income, many of which are deferred and contingent upon successes of an entertainment property, per Cohen. Celebrities read the headlines describing how much money they are making on a project and sometimes mistakenly believe that the reported gross compensation is available for their consumption. However, after payment to agents, managers, business managers and entertainment lawyers there is only a modest amount of cash available to maintain their extravagant lifestyles and pay their taxes.
“Celebrities frequently have enormous personal lifestyles expenses that enhance their public/professional image,” he said. “Examples of these expenses are entertainment, private aircraft, security and wardrobe. Often, their professionals will attempt to deduct those expense from their income. Not surprisingly, the taxing authorities are obsessed with auditing those expenses and often seek to partially or wholly disallow the expenses as personal and not business.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Trending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250