The IP Behind Software-as-a-Drug
When it comes to emerging health technology, securing the necessary IP protections means facing some pretty interesting challenges, including the task…
October 17, 2017 at 10:19 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When it comes to emerging health technology, securing the necessary IP protections means facing some pretty interesting challenges, including the task of educating patent examiners about an entirely new class of technology.
With healthcare startups and mobile health apps proliferating, a new category of digital healthcare has emerged: digital therapeutics. Also known as “software-as-a-drug,” digital therapeutics use Internet-based technology to help patients change a specific behavior. In fact, studies have shown the technology to be promising for treating a variety of medical and psychological conditions.
Recently, the FDA approved the country's first digital therapeutic: reSET, an app developed by Pear Therapeutics that's being used to help treat substance use disorders. Pear's patent attorney, Scott Barnett of intellectual property law firm Harness Dickey, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss the importance of IP to healthcare startups and this emerging category of digital therapeutics.
Today, digital therapeutics refer to treatments or therapies utilizing digital health technologies to treat medical or psychological conditions. In some instances, according to Barnett, digital therapeutics may be used in place of traditional pharmaceuticals, such as pills, while in other cases digital therapeutics may be used in conjunction with traditional pharmaceutics to improve patient outcomes. Pear's digital therapeutics are unique in that they are clinician prescribed, clinically validated, and in some cases, FDA-cleared. Pear has designed a suite of digital therapeutic offerings, each one succinctly tailored to treat a specific disease or disorder.
“One challenge associated with securing IP protection in a completely new field of technology is educating patent examiners about the technology,” he explained. “Patent examiners are organized according to very specific technology sectors and are accustomed to reviewing very similar types of technology on a day-to-day basis. So, when presenting patent examiners with an outside the box innovation, it becomes critical to supply the context and background information necessary to facilitate an informed decision.”
Healthcare technology, perhaps more so than other areas, has always been high-risk, high-reward. IP protection is essential to ensure adequate return on investment. While IP is useful for carving out exclusive rights in any market, it is even more important in healthcare where the stakes tend to be much higher.
“Analysis of IP rights is always a major step in any pre-investment due diligence. Understandably, investors want assurances that the companies they invest with—including Pear—have a competitive edge in the market,” said Barnett. “Exclusive IP rights frequently provide, or enhance, that competitive edge. Pear's strong IP rights have been a key factor in attracting substantial investment.”
These days, strong IP rights help create a cyclical path to growth, whereby existing IP rights carve out market share, spurring increased revenue. That increased revenue may, in turn, be poured back into the development of new product lines.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/02/Rachel-Gonzalez1-767x633.jpg)
Ex-Starbucks GC Exiting Latest Role, Will Get Severance
![ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c0/31/1004e572458aa2b2a7464624e175/business-leader-767x633.jpg)
![Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/416/2024/02/Advance-Auto-Parts-Store-1-767x633.jpg)
Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
2 minute read![RIP DOJ FCPA Corporate Prosecutions RIP DOJ FCPA Corporate Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3a/5b/1d5ac1e443f3b9b133cd12d9834f/united-states-department-of-justice-11-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250