LabCFTC Director Gives Next Steps for Fintech
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has met with more than 100 fintech companies in recent months as part of an effort to share information…
October 23, 2017 at 02:28 PM
6 minute read
CFTC headquarters. Photo credit: Diego Radzinschi.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has met with more than 100 fintech companies in recent months as part of an effort to share information and get feedback from these companies. And according to one of the CFTC's top officials handling fintech, it is ready to move forward with the industry in other ways too.
The commission's Daniel Gorfine, chief innovation officer and director of the fintech initiative dubbed LabCFTC, gave an update this past week on what's next for its work with fintech companies.
“There is little doubt that fintech innovation has the potential to—and already is—benefiting the American public,” Gorfine said, during a keynote address Oct. 19 at the FIA Futures and Options Expo in Chicago. “Whether through increased efficiency, lower transaction costs, or improved access, our society stands to improve based on such innovation.”
Gorfine mentioned in his remarks how distributed ledger and blockchain technologies “hold promise in transforming clearing and settlement processes,” as do smart contracts, the cloud and machine learning.
“These innovations are not without their risks, however,” said Gorfine, who moved to the CFTC in July after serving as an associate GC with fintech startup OnDeck.
“The disintermediation of traditional actors or their functions will strain rules written for a different, analog era,” he said. “Proper recognition of new actors in markets will necessitate regulatory consideration, though always with the careful balance of not prematurely stemming innovation. New hazards will emerge, whether around data security and cyber security, questions regarding governance and accountability, or risks around new asset classes, including those in the virtual realm.”
Gorfine named five areas in which LabCFTC has activities scheduled around fintech.
LabCFTC has held office hour sessions with fintech companies in New York, Washington, D.C., and Chicago. The commission has plans to visit Silicon Valley, Austin and Boston in coming months, Gorfine said, noting that the CFTC has so far met with more than 100 companies and will release an annual white paper with “aggregated learnings.”
“This form of engagement is our bread and butter, and the mechanism that provides us with the knowledge, questions and insights that drive our broader work,” he said.
The commission also released its first “LabCFTC Primer” about virtual currencies, which explains the CFTC's role in oversight.
The CFTC will also hold competitions for fintechs beginning in 2018 under the Science Prize Competition Act. The competitions could touch on a number of topics, Gorfine said, including novel ways to use or share data, make CFTC rules machine readable or build a “smart notice-and-comment platform.”
The CFTC's Technology Advisory Committee has re-formed, and Gorfine has been selected as the designated federal officer. Industry leaders will be involved with the committee to “make recommendations to the CFTC regarding technological innovations and advances.”
CFTC headquarters. Photo credit: Diego Radzinschi.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has met with more than 100 fintech companies in recent months as part of an effort to share information and get feedback from these companies. And according to one of the CFTC's top officials handling fintech, it is ready to move forward with the industry in other ways too.
The commission's Daniel Gorfine, chief innovation officer and director of the fintech initiative dubbed LabCFTC, gave an update this past week on what's next for its work with fintech companies.
“There is little doubt that fintech innovation has the potential to—and already is—benefiting the American public,” Gorfine said, during a keynote address Oct. 19 at the FIA Futures and Options Expo in Chicago. “Whether through increased efficiency, lower transaction costs, or improved access, our society stands to improve based on such innovation.”
Gorfine mentioned in his remarks how distributed ledger and blockchain technologies “hold promise in transforming clearing and settlement processes,” as do smart contracts, the cloud and machine learning.
“These innovations are not without their risks, however,” said Gorfine, who moved to the CFTC in July after serving as an associate GC with fintech startup OnDeck.
“The disintermediation of traditional actors or their functions will strain rules written for a different, analog era,” he said. “Proper recognition of new actors in markets will necessitate regulatory consideration, though always with the careful balance of not prematurely stemming innovation. New hazards will emerge, whether around data security and cyber security, questions regarding governance and accountability, or risks around new asset classes, including those in the virtual realm.”
Gorfine named five areas in which LabCFTC has activities scheduled around fintech.
LabCFTC has held office hour sessions with fintech companies in
“This form of engagement is our bread and butter, and the mechanism that provides us with the knowledge, questions and insights that drive our broader work,” he said.
The commission also released its first “LabCFTC Primer” about virtual currencies, which explains the CFTC's role in oversight.
The CFTC will also hold competitions for fintechs beginning in 2018 under the Science Prize Competition Act. The competitions could touch on a number of topics, Gorfine said, including novel ways to use or share data, make CFTC rules machine readable or build a “smart notice-and-comment platform.”
The CFTC's Technology Advisory Committee has re-formed, and Gorfine has been selected as the designated federal officer. Industry leaders will be involved with the committee to “make recommendations to the CFTC regarding technological innovations and advances.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
SEC Issues $6.75M Fine Against Financial Firm Led by Trump's Choice to Lead Commerce Dept.
3 minute readAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250