Contract, Labor & Employment Disputes Drive U.S. Litigation
The 2017 Litigation Trends Annual Survey from Norton Rose Fulbright gathered feedback from more than 300 corporate counsel, mostly GCs.
October 25, 2017 at 11:16 AM
12 minute read
Contract problems and labor and employment disputes generate the most corporate litigation, while regulatory and class actions are the “most concerning” legal matters for general counsel, according to a new survey released Wednesday.
The 2017 Litigation Trends Annual Survey from Norton Rose Fulbright polled some 318 corporate counsel, primarily general counsel, representing U.S. organizations. Litigation partner Saul Perloff, of Norton Rose Fulbright's San Antonio office, said the word “litigation” is used broadly in the survey and includes arbitration as well as internal investigations due to regulatory scrutiny.
The report shows a slight reduction in the overall number of disputes this year. Mean disputes per $100 million in revenue fell to 11.5 in 2017 from 11.8 in 2016. Perloff said in an interview that he thinks it is too early to call that dip a trend. “But it is certainly heading in the right direction,” he noted.
“What I find most interesting in the survey,” Perloff said, “was the focus on the risk that's presented by data security breaches.” Some two-thirds of respondents cited cybersecurity issues as the greatest emerging threat to business.
“All of us have seen the news reports of high-profile data breaches, but it's interesting to see how quickly the respondents internalized that and recognized it as an issue they need to address,” Perloff added.
One other finding that may intrigue general counsel involves a first-ever analysis of internal legal spend on disputes vs. external spend. On average, according to the survey, a legal department spends about 30 percent of its litigation budget in-house and the rest on outside counsel and consultants.
The survey found companies that spent between 41 and 60 percent of their litigation budget in-house actually spent less overall on disputes as a proportion of their organizations' revenue. In other words, spending on disputes as a proportion of a company's revenue is lower when internal spend is higher than average, and the external spend is lower.
It's an interesting observation, Perloff noted, “but not necessarily a recipe” for lowering dispute costs. He suggested it could be a starting point for discussions about bringing down litigation costs.
He said the numbers might have picked up spending on prophylactic measures, such as more training on writing better contracts or on early case assessments being done internally.
The survey showed the most effective factors in preventing litigation are training, early case resolution, lawyers embedded in the business and proactive contract review.
Here are some other high points from the 44-page report:
- The use of alternative fee arrangements remained fairly flat despite reported plans to increase them in last year's survey.
- About 74 percent said regulators have become more interventionist; that number is down from 97 percent in 2016.
- Both legal team size and the typical legal spend relative to revenue have increased since 2016.
- In contrast to other areas of legal spend outside of disputes, as organizations get larger and become more of a target, the proportion of disputes rises dramatically.
The 2017 Litigation Trends Annual Survey. (Photo:
Contract problems and labor and employment disputes generate the most corporate litigation, while regulatory and class actions are the “most concerning” legal matters for general counsel, according to a new survey released Wednesday.
The 2017 Litigation Trends Annual Survey from
The report shows a slight reduction in the overall number of disputes this year. Mean disputes per $100 million in revenue fell to 11.5 in 2017 from 11.8 in 2016. Perloff said in an interview that he thinks it is too early to call that dip a trend. “But it is certainly heading in the right direction,” he noted.
“What I find most interesting in the survey,” Perloff said, “was the focus on the risk that's presented by data security breaches.” Some two-thirds of respondents cited cybersecurity issues as the greatest emerging threat to business.
“All of us have seen the news reports of high-profile data breaches, but it's interesting to see how quickly the respondents internalized that and recognized it as an issue they need to address,” Perloff added.
One other finding that may intrigue general counsel involves a first-ever analysis of internal legal spend on disputes vs. external spend. On average, according to the survey, a legal department spends about 30 percent of its litigation budget in-house and the rest on outside counsel and consultants.
The survey found companies that spent between 41 and 60 percent of their litigation budget in-house actually spent less overall on disputes as a proportion of their organizations' revenue. In other words, spending on disputes as a proportion of a company's revenue is lower when internal spend is higher than average, and the external spend is lower.
It's an interesting observation, Perloff noted, “but not necessarily a recipe” for lowering dispute costs. He suggested it could be a starting point for discussions about bringing down litigation costs.
He said the numbers might have picked up spending on prophylactic measures, such as more training on writing better contracts or on early case assessments being done internally.
The survey showed the most effective factors in preventing litigation are training, early case resolution, lawyers embedded in the business and proactive contract review.
Here are some other high points from the 44-page report:
- The use of alternative fee arrangements remained fairly flat despite reported plans to increase them in last year's survey.
- About 74 percent said regulators have become more interventionist; that number is down from 97 percent in 2016.
- Both legal team size and the typical legal spend relative to revenue have increased since 2016.
- In contrast to other areas of legal spend outside of disputes, as organizations get larger and become more of a target, the proportion of disputes rises dramatically.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Apple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250