Identifying and Protecting Confidential Information
Today, the reality is that what qualifies as confidential information touches on virtually every single practice area. Confidential information is…
November 01, 2017 at 02:50 PM
3 minute read
Today, the reality is that what qualifies as confidential information touches on virtually every single practice area. Confidential information is the least tangible form of intellectual property because it is not registrable. But, lack of registrability makes it no less important or protectable. Confidential information may be a client's most valuable, yet unforeseen, asset because a business's value is becoming increasingly tied to its IP, which is also comprised of confidential information.
Terrell R. Miller, Partner at Gardere, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss why the universe of what can qualify as confidential information is so vast and touches on essentially every practice area.
“Aside from the general concepts that confidential information comprises information of any nature or form that isn't generally known to the public, the scope of confidential information can be very broad since there are no real black and white definitions applicable,” he explained. “Often, the scope of confidential information is dictated by the parties to an agreement, and as such, is tailored to fit the needs of those particular parties.”
It's not uncommon for confidential information to encompass trade secrets, research and development, product designs, customer pricing histories and terms, customer preferences, manufacturing methods, formulas and technical know-how. Basically, confidential information can be any non-public information that a business deems valuable and would not want in the hands of its competitors. Given such broad scope, it's easy to see why confidential information can touch on essentially every practice area from product design, to manufacturing, to customer preferences, and ultimately to customer pricing.
By understanding how to identify confidential information, practitioners will be able to best maintain the confidentiality status by implementing safeguards and processes to maintain its non-public and confidential nature. For instance, limiting access to confidential information to only employees who need to know it and obtaining executed confidentiality agreements from persons who obtain access to the information for legitimate and defined business needs are two prime ways to protect confidential information and maintain its status.
According to Miller, the most common and most litigated examples, involve protection of trade secret information. For example, most people are aware of Coca-Cola's position that its soft drink formula is a trade secret. As a form of confidential information, if Coca-Cola allowed the formula to become public, assuming no nefarious conduct in the publication, its alleged competitive advantage over other soft drink makers would be lost, as the formula would become public knowledge and available for third parties to use in competition.
Since confidential information is so fluid as to its scope, and can be defined by contracting parties, it can be difficult in many instances to identify the many types of information that can fall within the scope of confidential information. Due to this inability to easily identify and define confidential information, it's often viewed as the least tangible form of IP, per Miller. He said, “Because if utilizing certain confidential information benefits your business, and that competitive advantage would be lost if the information were made public and available for use by your competitors, then its value in keeping it confidential may not be easy to quantify on the company's books, but its asset value is undeniable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/29/d9/a50e79ac4b8b85966f53f223c3af/multiple-data-767x633.jpg)
NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
![Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24 Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250