SEC Gets Tough With 235 Subpoenas Tied to Billion-Dollar Investment Firm
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an action to enforce subpoenas against 235 companies connected to the Woodbridge Group of Companies.
November 02, 2017 at 05:02 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday filed an action to enforce subpoenas against 235 companies as part of an investigation into possible securities fraud at the Woodbridge Group of Companies, which has received over $1 billion in investor funds.
The SEC said in the filing that the companies are believed to be affiliated with Woodbridge and may be owned or controlled by the group's president, Robert Shapiro. The companies failed to meet an Aug. 31 deadline for producing the subpoenaed records, according to the commission.
The commission filed its enforcement action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where it said the investigation is occurring. The Better Business Bureau for Southeast Florida lists Woodbridge and Shapiro as having an accredited office in Boca Raton that buys structured settlements.
Woodbridge said in statement on Nov. 6, “Woodbridge Group of Companies has cooperated, and will continue to cooperate, with the Securities and Exchange Commission's exceedingly broad request for documents. As of today, we have provided in excess of four million pages of documents to the agency in response to its requests.” The statement continued, “Woodbridge, in its years of dealing with a multitude of regulators, has never been found to have engaged in any fraud, and has never settled a matter that included such a charge. Woodbridge stands squarely behind its business model, and its investors and lenders.”
Such a large number of subpoenas is highly unusual in an SEC investigation.
“This is an extraordinary number of subpoenas. At the commission, I never heard of any team doing so many,” said attorney Jordan Thomas, who is not involved in the case. Thomas, now head of the whistleblower practice at Labaton Sucharow, previously served as assistant chief litigation counsel and later assistant director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement.
The commission said in its filing that the 235 limited liability companies are not cooperating with the fraud investigation and that Shapiro has asserted his Fifth Amendment right not to speak to investigators. It said the companies are registered in either Colorado or Delaware, which do not make corporate ownership records public.
The SEC said that only the information sought by the subpoenas can “definitively establish the ownership structure” and help the commission understand the flow of money in the investigation.
Specifically, the SEC said it is investigating the offer and sale of unregistered securities, the sale of securities by unregistered brokers, and the commission of fraud in connection with the offer, purchase and sale of securities. The commission wants to know “the identity of who formed the LLCs, who owns them, and whether there has been any transfer of money from the LLCs to Woodbridge.” It said Shapiro has signed documents on behalf of the LLCs as the manager.
The SEC said among the financial products offered by Woodbridge is a first position commercial mortgage, described as “a private third party loan to Woodbridge [which] provides higher returns with shorter terms secured by commercial real estate.” Each time a property is purchased by Woodbridge for its inventory, another LLC is formed, according to the SEC.
Ken Yormark, newly hired managing director and head of U.S. forensic accounting at K2 Intelligence, handles corruption and securities investigations for a variety of industries. K2, he said, helps corporations and high-wealth individuals caught up in such legal matters.
He said if he were advising a company being investigated by the SEC, he would see “if there were glaring insufficiencies in the compliance procedures or controls, and make every effort to remediate those as soon as possible.”
He said based on the SEC's filing, “I would be concerned about how the internal accounting is being done, how the reporting is done, and what [information] is going out to investors.”
As for investors, whether companies or individuals, he recommended that they know with whom they are investing by researching the organization thoroughly. “Understand its philosophies and really do proper due diligence so you are comfortable in that environment,” he explained.
This story has been updated to include comment from Woodbridge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManafort Found Guilty of Bank, Tax Fraud in First Trial Win for Mueller
6 minute readCisco, Arista Settle IP, Antitrust Disputes With Arista Paying $400M
Acting AG Underwood Announces Intent to Sue Purdue Pharma Over Opioids
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250