Equifax Execs Cleared Related to Stock Sales After Breach
The four executives who sold stocks just days after Equifax Inc.'s security department observed suspicious activity have been cleared by…
November 03, 2017 at 06:20 PM
4 minute read
Equifax Atlanta HQ. Photo by John Disney/ ALM. |
The four executives who sold stocks just days after Equifax Inc.'s security department observed suspicious activity have been cleared by a special committee tasked with looking at various aspects of the breach. The execs in question did not have knowledge of the security incident and “received clearance from the appropriate Legal Department personnel prior to trading,” according to the report from the special committee.
Questions about the timing of these sales often focus on the company's chief legal officer, John Kelley III, who along with being in charge of company cybersecurity is responsible for approving share sales by Equifax executives. But per the report, Kelley, who did not immediately respond to request for comment for this article, followed company policies with respect to these stock sales and had no reason to believe the execs in question had knowledge of the data security incident.
In September, the same month the cybersecurity incident was announced, Equifax's board formed the special committee of independent directors to look at the company's response to the breach that has affected some 145 million U.S. consumers to company policies and the stock sales, among other issues. The focus for the report, released Nov. 3, was on the securities trading.
Given his roles within the company, it comes as no surprise that Kelley has been a point of focus with respect to the breach. In multiple hearings before Congress in October, former Equifax CEO Richard Smith was pressed, in part, about the timing of the stock sales and Kelley's decision to approve the transactions. Smith testified that he believed Kelley was notified about suspicious activity on July 31. On the same day and on Aug. 1, Kelley approved stock sales totaling roughly $1.8 million from CFO John Gamble, president of U.S. information solutions Joseph Loughran and president of workforce solutions Rodolfo Ploder.
Friday's announcement noted that Douglas Brandberg, senior vice president of investor relations, received pre-clearance to sell Equifax securities on Aug. 1. All trades were executed on Aug. 1 and Aug. 2.
But after looking through more than 55,000 documents—including emails, text messages and other records—the special committee determined that “none of the four executives had knowledge of the incident when their trades were made, that preclearance for the four trades was appropriately obtained, that each of the four trades at issue comported with Company policy, and that none of the four executives engaged in insider trading.”
As part of this review, the special committee examined “all Equifax emails, texts, voicemails, calendars, and other electronic documents for the period of July 29 through August 2” from those in the legal department most involved in the security investigation and/or the preclearance of the trades in question. In person or telephone interviews were also conducted of those who potentially knew about the investigation of the data security incident on or before the trades were made, which would likely include Kelley.
Per the report, Equifax policy stipulates that directors and certain senior officers may only trade Equifax securities in specified trade windows and must receive preclearance from Kelley or his designee. Each of the four execs sent an email to the legal department requesting preclearance between July 28 and Aug. 1. In one case, greater specificity was requested from the legal department related to the number of types of shares to be sold, but ultimately, all received the required preclearance.
“Based on its review, the Committee has concluded that neither Equifax's Chief Legal Officer nor his designated preclearance officer had reason to believe that Messrs Gamble, Loughran, Ploder, or Brandberg had knowledge of the security incident's existence as of the date of their preclearance requests or the date of their trades,” according to the report. “Accordingly, the Special Committee has concluded that the preclearance authorization obtained by [these four executives] was within the authority permitted under the policy.”
The report also revealed that on Aug. 15, Equifax's legal department imposed a trading blackout on all company personnel “identified as aware of the breach as of that date.”
This may not be the end of the questioning for Kelley and Equifax around the stock sales, though, as the U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly opened a criminal investigation into whether the executives' actions amounted to insider trading.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments’ Lack of Third-Party Oversight Leaving Small, Midsized Banks Exposed
4 minute readTen Best Practices to Protect Your Organization Against Cyber Threats
7 minute readSEC Fines 4 Companies $7M for Downplaying Breaches Tied to Massive SolarWinds Hack
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250