Vimeo GC, Tech Companies Criticize FCC's Latest Net Neutrality Plan
One GC called the plan "misguided" in a blog post, and tech companies have denounced the proposed change.
November 22, 2017 at 12:20 PM
6 minute read
The issue of net neutrality has elicited strong views from companies and their in-house counsel in recent years. So when Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai offered a plan Tuesday to eliminate Obama-era regulations around net neutrality, companies spoke up quickly, with one prominent GC, Michael Cheah of New York-based Vimeo, going so far as to call the move “misguided” in a blog post.
Pai announced that the FCC will vote in December on whether to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, which mandates that internet service providers such as Verizon and AT&T can't block websites or charge them extra for faster bandwidth. If the order is repealed, internet service providers would likely see a boost in profits, but consumers may get companies' bandwidth costs passed on to them.
“The announcement is a disappointing development, to be sure, but it's not surprising,” Cheah wrote. “From day one, Mr. Pai has made it clear that he would not let the mountain of evidence (and millions of commenters) demonstrating why we need neutrality get in the way of his crusade to make the internet more like the cable business. The result is a repeal order that no one wants—except for the largest ISPs.”
Cheah has been a vocal supporter for net neutrality over the past year. In July, he encouraged participation in a one-day protest against the Trump administration's stance on the issue. He's previously said that the current laws allow smaller content creators, like those who create videos on his platform, compete for attention online. Without net neutrality, they'd have to spend extra money to promote their work.
And Cheah is not the only one in tech who is worried.
Dozens of tech companies, including Microsoft Corp., Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., spoke out through a shared statement via the Internet Association, an industry lobbying group, following the FCC announcement. Netflix Inc. and Google, also members of the Internet Association, doubled down on the message with their own statements expressing disappointment and their opposition to the new proposal.
“The 2015 Order created bright-line, enforceable net neutrality protections that guarantee consumers access to the entire internet and preserve competition online,” said the Internet Association statement. “This proposal fails to achieve any of these objectives. Consumers have little choice in their ISP, and service providers should not be allowed to use this gatekeeper position at the point of connection to discriminate against websites and apps.”
The Internet Association said its members will continue to fight for net neutrality. Cheah also said he will promote litigation against the FCC plan and push for a permanent statutory solution.
“The path to enforceable net neutrality rules has never been easy,” Cheah said. “With some further heavy lifting, Chairman Pai's actions today will hopefully be remembered five years from now as a brief detour down the wrong road.”
Ajit Pai of the Federal Communications Commission. Photo Credit: FCC.The issue of net neutrality has elicited strong views from companies and their in-house counsel in recent years. So when Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai offered a plan Tuesday to eliminate Obama-era regulations around net neutrality, companies spoke up quickly, with one prominent GC, Michael Cheah of New York-based Vimeo, going so far as to call the move “misguided” in a blog post.
Pai announced that the FCC will vote in December on whether to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, which mandates that internet service providers such as Verizon and
“The announcement is a disappointing development, to be sure, but it's not surprising,” Cheah wrote. “From day one, Mr. Pai has made it clear that he would not let the mountain of evidence (and millions of commenters) demonstrating why we need neutrality get in the way of his crusade to make the internet more like the cable business. The result is a repeal order that no one wants—except for the largest ISPs.”
Cheah has been a vocal supporter for net neutrality over the past year. In July, he encouraged participation in a one-day protest against the Trump administration's stance on the issue. He's previously said that the current laws allow smaller content creators, like those who create videos on his platform, compete for attention online. Without net neutrality, they'd have to spend extra money to promote their work.
And Cheah is not the only one in tech who is worried.
Dozens of tech companies, including
“The 2015 Order created bright-line, enforceable net neutrality protections that guarantee consumers access to the entire internet and preserve competition online,” said the Internet Association statement. “This proposal fails to achieve any of these objectives. Consumers have little choice in their ISP, and service providers should not be allowed to use this gatekeeper position at the point of connection to discriminate against websites and apps.”
The Internet Association said its members will continue to fight for net neutrality. Cheah also said he will promote litigation against the FCC plan and push for a permanent statutory solution.
“The path to enforceable net neutrality rules has never been easy,” Cheah said. “With some further heavy lifting, Chairman Pai's actions today will hopefully be remembered five years from now as a brief detour down the wrong road.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSonos' Legal Chief Sees Pay More Than Quadruple Amid Executive Upheaval
3 minute readPrivate Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Apple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Settlements Totaled $40B+ Three Years in a Row: 'We’re in a New Era'
- 2Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
- 3MLB's Texas Rangers Search For a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
- 4Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
- 5Gen AI Legal Tech Startup Eve Raises $47 Million Series A Investment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250