Vimeo GC, Tech Companies Criticize FCC's Latest Net Neutrality Plan
One GC called the plan "misguided" in a blog post, and tech companies have denounced the proposed change.
November 22, 2017 at 12:20 PM
6 minute read
Ajit Pai of the Federal Communications Commission. Photo Credit: FCC.
The issue of net neutrality has elicited strong views from companies and their in-house counsel in recent years. So when Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai offered a plan Tuesday to eliminate Obama-era regulations around net neutrality, companies spoke up quickly, with one prominent GC, Michael Cheah of New York-based Vimeo, going so far as to call the move “misguided” in a blog post.
Pai announced that the FCC will vote in December on whether to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, which mandates that internet service providers such as Verizon and AT&T can't block websites or charge them extra for faster bandwidth. If the order is repealed, internet service providers would likely see a boost in profits, but consumers may get companies' bandwidth costs passed on to them.
“The announcement is a disappointing development, to be sure, but it's not surprising,” Cheah wrote. “From day one, Mr. Pai has made it clear that he would not let the mountain of evidence (and millions of commenters) demonstrating why we need neutrality get in the way of his crusade to make the internet more like the cable business. The result is a repeal order that no one wants—except for the largest ISPs.”
Cheah has been a vocal supporter for net neutrality over the past year. In July, he encouraged participation in a one-day protest against the Trump administration's stance on the issue. He's previously said that the current laws allow smaller content creators, like those who create videos on his platform, compete for attention online. Without net neutrality, they'd have to spend extra money to promote their work.
And Cheah is not the only one in tech who is worried.
Dozens of tech companies, including Microsoft Corp., Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., spoke out through a shared statement via the Internet Association, an industry lobbying group, following the FCC announcement. Netflix Inc. and Google, also members of the Internet Association, doubled down on the message with their own statements expressing disappointment and their opposition to the new proposal.
“The 2015 Order created bright-line, enforceable net neutrality protections that guarantee consumers access to the entire internet and preserve competition online,” said the Internet Association statement. “This proposal fails to achieve any of these objectives. Consumers have little choice in their ISP, and service providers should not be allowed to use this gatekeeper position at the point of connection to discriminate against websites and apps.”
The Internet Association said its members will continue to fight for net neutrality. Cheah also said he will promote litigation against the FCC plan and push for a permanent statutory solution.
“The path to enforceable net neutrality rules has never been easy,” Cheah said. “With some further heavy lifting, Chairman Pai's actions today will hopefully be remembered five years from now as a brief detour down the wrong road.”
Ajit Pai of the Federal Communications Commission. Photo Credit: FCC.
The issue of net neutrality has elicited strong views from companies and their in-house counsel in recent years. So when Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai offered a plan Tuesday to eliminate Obama-era regulations around net neutrality, companies spoke up quickly, with one prominent GC, Michael Cheah of New York-based Vimeo, going so far as to call the move “misguided” in a blog post.
Pai announced that the FCC will vote in December on whether to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, which mandates that internet service providers such as Verizon and
“The announcement is a disappointing development, to be sure, but it's not surprising,” Cheah wrote. “From day one, Mr. Pai has made it clear that he would not let the mountain of evidence (and millions of commenters) demonstrating why we need neutrality get in the way of his crusade to make the internet more like the cable business. The result is a repeal order that no one wants—except for the largest ISPs.”
Cheah has been a vocal supporter for net neutrality over the past year. In July, he encouraged participation in a one-day protest against the Trump administration's stance on the issue. He's previously said that the current laws allow smaller content creators, like those who create videos on his platform, compete for attention online. Without net neutrality, they'd have to spend extra money to promote their work.
And Cheah is not the only one in tech who is worried.
Dozens of tech companies, including
“The 2015 Order created bright-line, enforceable net neutrality protections that guarantee consumers access to the entire internet and preserve competition online,” said the Internet Association statement. “This proposal fails to achieve any of these objectives. Consumers have little choice in their ISP, and service providers should not be allowed to use this gatekeeper position at the point of connection to discriminate against websites and apps.”
The Internet Association said its members will continue to fight for net neutrality. Cheah also said he will promote litigation against the FCC plan and push for a permanent statutory solution.
“The path to enforceable net neutrality rules has never been easy,” Cheah said. “With some further heavy lifting, Chairman Pai's actions today will hopefully be remembered five years from now as a brief detour down the wrong road.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent Layoff/Callback Litigation Underscores Perils Employers Face From Every Direction
5 minute readIn-House Gurus Say Inattention to Human Side of Tech Adoption Can Derail Best-Laid Plans
5 minute readNike Promotes Legal Chief to Marketing Chief as New CEO Launches Turnaround
Inside Track: Lawyers for Big Tech Give Harris Benefit of Doubt, Despite Pummeling They Took Under Biden
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250