Sexual Harassment Training: Cultivating a Culture of Compliance
The #metoo phenomenon is a cultural tidal wave and it's only a matter of time before the ripple effects are felt in the everyday workplace outside of Hollywood and Capitol Hill.
November 29, 2017 at 02:33 PM
5 minute read
The #metoo phenomenon is a cultural tidal wave and it's only a matter of time before the ripple effects are felt in the everyday workplace outside of Hollywood and Capitol Hill. Employers that don't want to become the next headline should take immediate action to conduct an audit of their culture, polices and compliance levels surrounding sexual harassment. Are you cultivating a culture of compliance or are you on the brink of a PR and legal disaster?
Cultivating a culture of compliance begins at the top. Even high quality training conducted in a workplace that turns a blind eye to misbehavior is essentially useless. Employers must couple effective, ongoing training with strong leadership and accountability to create an environment where all employees feel safe and respected.
Not only do employers need to ensure they maintain clear and strong policies prohibiting harassment, but they must enforce and reinforce those policies. Employees who believe the company's no harassment policy may have been violated must feel that they can trust Human Resources or Legal with their story. If employees don't, you are potentially pushing employees into the offices of plaintiff's attorneys or fostering an environment where easily remedied concerns turn into a much bigger problem.
An effective complaint procedure is one that works to stop misconduct. In most companies, stopping harassment requires the intervention of high-level managers, senior HR leaders or legal. Thus, the complaint procedure should direct complaints to those very levels. While an employee can be encouraged to inform his or her supervisor, an employee should be required to report perceived or actual policy violations to high levels within the company.
Ongoing and effective harassment training should include “See Something, Say Something.” Managers often assume that if no one complains, no action is required when nothing could be further from the truth. If a manager sees or hears conduct—or even rumors of conduct—that might violate the company's no harassment policy, the manager needs to know what to do. Of course, “what to do” often depends on the level of the manager who has learned of a potential problem and/or the size and complexity of the organization, so training managers on “what's next” is critical. In some organizations, the manager may be responsible for investigating and solving the matter personally, while in others, the manager may just be required to report the matter to HR or Legal. Regardless, all levels of employees need to understand that they are being asked to lookout for themselves as well as to lookout for others. Managers in particular need to be trained to talk to employees from time to time about the company's no harassment policy as part of general informational meetings and to keep a watchful eye and ear on the behavior of all employees at all times.
The law, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and even the dictionary can provide a definition of harassment. However, interpreting the definition and applying it in the workplace can be difficult. Just when does conduct go from rude, annoying or unpleasant to offensive and ultimately unlawful? Answering that question can be challenging in some circumstances even for well-trained, experienced employment lawyers since ultimately, taken to the extreme, each set of facts must be evaluated by a jury before a verdict is rendered. Of course, some circumstances are so obvious that even a kindergartner would say “That's harassment!” Given the inherent difficulty in making the determination, employers are best served by creating a culture of respect and professionalism. Creating such a culture also requires training.
Managers are most likely to be accused of harassment. Thus, managers need tools to help them avoid harassment, understand they may be accused, and trained to avoid retaliating against an accuser. Quality training helps to set the tone for middle management so that they can then set the tone for the employees they supervise.
Further, be sure senior leadership, HR and Legal all understand how to respond if non-compliant conduct is observed or if a complaint is made. This step also requires specialized training that contains different and more detailed instruction than manager training.
Next Steps
As corporate counsel, you should take these steps to minimize potential harassment. Review and update your polices to be sure (1) all forms of unlawful harassment and discrimination are covered, (2) the policy contains a clear, easy to follow and effective reporting mechanism with multiple levels of reporting options, and (3) the policy explains and prohibits retaliation.
Next: train, train and train. While training alone will not prevent all workplace harassment, training must be done. Training sets the tone regarding company culture and demonstrates the company's commitment to a harassment-free workplace.
Lastly, and most importantly, when the no harassment policy may have been violated or when an employee makes a complaint, investigate and resolve the matter with appropriate corrective action. Showing employees that the company reacts promptly and appropriately reinforces the culture of compliance and professionalism.
Jennifer Sandberg is an attorney with Fisher Phillips, a national labor and employment law firm that represents employers. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC Bar’s Proposed Anti-Discrimination, Harassment Conduct Rule Sees More Pushback
- 2California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
- 3Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
- 4Top Leadership Changes Coming for NJ Attorney General's Office
- 5SCOTUSBlog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250