Sexual Harassment Training: Cultivating a Culture of Compliance
The #metoo phenomenon is a cultural tidal wave and it's only a matter of time before the ripple effects are felt in the everyday workplace outside of Hollywood and Capitol Hill.
November 29, 2017 at 02:33 PM
5 minute read
The #metoo phenomenon is a cultural tidal wave and it's only a matter of time before the ripple effects are felt in the everyday workplace outside of Hollywood and Capitol Hill. Employers that don't want to become the next headline should take immediate action to conduct an audit of their culture, polices and compliance levels surrounding sexual harassment. Are you cultivating a culture of compliance or are you on the brink of a PR and legal disaster?
Cultivating a culture of compliance begins at the top. Even high quality training conducted in a workplace that turns a blind eye to misbehavior is essentially useless. Employers must couple effective, ongoing training with strong leadership and accountability to create an environment where all employees feel safe and respected.
Not only do employers need to ensure they maintain clear and strong policies prohibiting harassment, but they must enforce and reinforce those policies. Employees who believe the company's no harassment policy may have been violated must feel that they can trust Human Resources or Legal with their story. If employees don't, you are potentially pushing employees into the offices of plaintiff's attorneys or fostering an environment where easily remedied concerns turn into a much bigger problem.
An effective complaint procedure is one that works to stop misconduct. In most companies, stopping harassment requires the intervention of high-level managers, senior HR leaders or legal. Thus, the complaint procedure should direct complaints to those very levels. While an employee can be encouraged to inform his or her supervisor, an employee should be required to report perceived or actual policy violations to high levels within the company.
Ongoing and effective harassment training should include “See Something, Say Something.” Managers often assume that if no one complains, no action is required when nothing could be further from the truth. If a manager sees or hears conduct—or even rumors of conduct—that might violate the company's no harassment policy, the manager needs to know what to do. Of course, “what to do” often depends on the level of the manager who has learned of a potential problem and/or the size and complexity of the organization, so training managers on “what's next” is critical. In some organizations, the manager may be responsible for investigating and solving the matter personally, while in others, the manager may just be required to report the matter to HR or Legal. Regardless, all levels of employees need to understand that they are being asked to lookout for themselves as well as to lookout for others. Managers in particular need to be trained to talk to employees from time to time about the company's no harassment policy as part of general informational meetings and to keep a watchful eye and ear on the behavior of all employees at all times.
The law, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and even the dictionary can provide a definition of harassment. However, interpreting the definition and applying it in the workplace can be difficult. Just when does conduct go from rude, annoying or unpleasant to offensive and ultimately unlawful? Answering that question can be challenging in some circumstances even for well-trained, experienced employment lawyers since ultimately, taken to the extreme, each set of facts must be evaluated by a jury before a verdict is rendered. Of course, some circumstances are so obvious that even a kindergartner would say “That's harassment!” Given the inherent difficulty in making the determination, employers are best served by creating a culture of respect and professionalism. Creating such a culture also requires training.
Managers are most likely to be accused of harassment. Thus, managers need tools to help them avoid harassment, understand they may be accused, and trained to avoid retaliating against an accuser. Quality training helps to set the tone for middle management so that they can then set the tone for the employees they supervise.
Further, be sure senior leadership, HR and Legal all understand how to respond if non-compliant conduct is observed or if a complaint is made. This step also requires specialized training that contains different and more detailed instruction than manager training.
|Next Steps
As corporate counsel, you should take these steps to minimize potential harassment. Review and update your polices to be sure (1) all forms of unlawful harassment and discrimination are covered, (2) the policy contains a clear, easy to follow and effective reporting mechanism with multiple levels of reporting options, and (3) the policy explains and prohibits retaliation.
Next: train, train and train. While training alone will not prevent all workplace harassment, training must be done. Training sets the tone regarding company culture and demonstrates the company's commitment to a harassment-free workplace.
Lastly, and most importantly, when the no harassment policy may have been violated or when an employee makes a complaint, investigate and resolve the matter with appropriate corrective action. Showing employees that the company reacts promptly and appropriately reinforces the culture of compliance and professionalism.
Jennifer Sandberg is an attorney with Fisher Phillips, a national labor and employment law firm that represents employers. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmployers Scramble to Get Immigration Records in Order Ahead of Trump Crackdown
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
- 2Trying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
- 3People in the News—Dec. 12, 2024—Pietragallo Gordon, Fox Rothschild
- 4Recent Decisions from the United States District Court for the Eastern District
- 5SoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250