Patagonia Fights Trump's Monument Decision With Announced Lawsuit
The outdoor apparel and gear company has made the decision to file suit against the Trump administration over its move to cut back protected lands in Utah.
December 06, 2017 at 06:03 PM
7 minute read
President Donald Trump. Photo credit: Michael Candelori/Shutterstock.com.
While nonprofit environmental groups and Indian tribes this week sued President Donald Trump's administration over his decision to drastically cut back two national monument sites in Utah, one for-profit company has also decided to step into the legal fray.
Patagonia, a Ventura, California-based company that sells outdoor apparel and gear and that has roughly $800 million in annual revenue, explained Wednesday why it was joining the fight. In a statement, CEO Rose Marcario said, “We aren't going to just stand by. Protecting public lands is a core tenet of our mission and vitally important to our industry, and we feel we need to do everything in our power to protect this special place.”
In a proclamation Dec. 4, Trump said the government would eliminate large parts of Bears Ears National Monument, as well as Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.
Outdoor gear retailers REI and The North Face also released statements protesting Trump's decision, but stopped short of filing suit.
In her statement, Marcario listed four overall reasons for Patagonia's suit, which was expected to be filed late Wednesday. They were:
• To carry out the company's purpose as a “benefit corporation” with articles of incorporation that require it to confront environmental threats.
• To stand with its grassroots partners. Marcario said Patagonia has donated more than $80 million to partnering environmental groups to protect public lands.
• To enforce the law. As other groups have done, she cited the Antiquities Act of 1906 as giving Congress, not the president, the power to undo a monument designation. Trump has accused environmentalists of lying about what the law says.
• To defend Patagonia's business and the outdoor recreation industry in general.
“Patagonia's business relies directly on public lands, like Indian Creek in Bears Ears, which hosts world-class climbing,” Marcario said. National monuments and other special public lands draw millions of visitors a year, and help make outdoor recreation America's fourth-largest industry, driving $887 billion in annual consumer spending and 7.6 million jobs, according to the Outdoor Industry Association, she added.
The company's website appeared Wednesday with a stark black-and-white message, saying simply: “The President Stole Your Land.” The website went on to tell individuals and businesses how they could get involved in the fight.
Patagonia general counsel Hilary Dessouky was not immediately available for comment on Wednesday. But since June she has been an outspoken critic after Trump announced he was considering cutting back the lands.
In an interview with Earth Justice, an environmental law firm in June, Dessouky explained why her company threatened to sue Trump. “We didn't see it as a choice,” she said. “Protecting wild places where natural resources are preserved has always been a core part of our mission. When it looked like much of that work was going to be threatened, it was the next logical step.”
Dessouky said Patagonia has seen an amazing response from its customers. “People are interested. They want to get involved, and we're going to look for every way we can to bring them into the conversation,” she said.
The general counsel also sits on the board of directors of One Percent For the Planet, a foundation that brings together a network of businesses and individuals to support environmental solutions by donating both money and time to projects.
President Donald Trump. Photo credit: Michael Candelori/Shutterstock.com.
While nonprofit environmental groups and Indian tribes this week sued President Donald Trump's administration over his decision to drastically cut back two national monument sites in Utah, one for-profit company has also decided to step into the legal fray.
Patagonia, a Ventura, California-based company that sells outdoor apparel and gear and that has roughly $800 million in annual revenue, explained Wednesday why it was joining the fight. In a statement, CEO Rose Marcario said, “We aren't going to just stand by. Protecting public lands is a core tenet of our mission and vitally important to our industry, and we feel we need to do everything in our power to protect this special place.”
In a proclamation Dec. 4, Trump said the government would eliminate large parts of Bears Ears National Monument, as well as Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.
Outdoor gear retailers REI and The North Face also released statements protesting Trump's decision, but stopped short of filing suit.
In her statement, Marcario listed four overall reasons for Patagonia's suit, which was expected to be filed late Wednesday. They were:
• To carry out the company's purpose as a “benefit corporation” with articles of incorporation that require it to confront environmental threats.
• To stand with its grassroots partners. Marcario said Patagonia has donated more than $80 million to partnering environmental groups to protect public lands.
• To enforce the law. As other groups have done, she cited the Antiquities Act of 1906 as giving Congress, not the president, the power to undo a monument designation. Trump has accused environmentalists of lying about what the law says.
• To defend Patagonia's business and the outdoor recreation industry in general.
“Patagonia's business relies directly on public lands, like Indian Creek in Bears Ears, which hosts world-class climbing,” Marcario said. National monuments and other special public lands draw millions of visitors a year, and help make outdoor recreation America's fourth-largest industry, driving $887 billion in annual consumer spending and 7.6 million jobs, according to the Outdoor Industry Association, she added.
The company's website appeared Wednesday with a stark black-and-white message, saying simply: “The President Stole Your Land.” The website went on to tell individuals and businesses how they could get involved in the fight.
Patagonia general counsel Hilary Dessouky was not immediately available for comment on Wednesday. But since June she has been an outspoken critic after Trump announced he was considering cutting back the lands.
In an interview with Earth Justice, an environmental law firm in June, Dessouky explained why her company threatened to sue Trump. “We didn't see it as a choice,” she said. “Protecting wild places where natural resources are preserved has always been a core part of our mission. When it looked like much of that work was going to be threatened, it was the next logical step.”
Dessouky said Patagonia has seen an amazing response from its customers. “People are interested. They want to get involved, and we're going to look for every way we can to bring them into the conversation,” she said.
The general counsel also sits on the board of directors of One Percent For the Planet, a foundation that brings together a network of businesses and individuals to support environmental solutions by donating both money and time to projects.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readEx-Six Flags CLO Lands New C-Suite Post—This Time as HR Chief
Trending Stories
- 1U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe Stepped Down
- 2Slideshow: Judges Who've Retired But Didn't Step Down
- 3Husch Blackwell Hires Former Adobe Counsel to Oversee AI Advisory Offering
- 4CFPB Finalizes Rule Removing Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 5'Don't F-- With Me in My Court:' Texas Judge in Hot Water
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250