Report: Most Companies Fail to Disclose Cybersecurity as a Risk Factor in SEC Filings
Companies still aren't talking about their fear of breaches in filings, but that could change as cybersecurity continues to grow as a priority for regulators.
December 08, 2017 at 05:34 PM
7 minute read
In recent years, the number of companies identifying cybersecurity as a risk factor in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings has grown tremendously. But there appears to have been a leveling off in 2017, which may indicate that companies “have blinders on” when it comes to disclosing cybersecurity risks, according to a new report.
From 2012 to 2016, the number of companies reporting cybersecurity as a risk factor in SEC filings has grown 277 percent, the report from Intelligize Inc. shows. Despite that increase though, the report, which is based on all public company SEC filings from 2012 to this year, indicates that there's still only a relatively small proportion of all public companies—38 percent—citing cybersecurity as a risk factor in quarterly and annual filings.
What's more, the report said, while by 2016, 1,662 public companies reported cybersecurity was a risk factor, as of Oct. 31 of this year, that number had only seen a slight bump to 1,680 companies
The slowdown in disclosing cyber as a risk may indicate one of two things, Todd Hicks, CEO of Intelligize, said in an email. It means companies “either they have blinders on—or they are deliberately not acknowledging the risks because they don't want to tip off potential hackers,” he said.
But Hicks added that he expects to see more reporting from companies in the coming years. “For the 62 percent of public companies not disclosing, I would expect that number to get smaller over the next few years, especially as the SEC gets stricter on rules around specific risk factor disclosure,” Hicks said.
And this is particularly true if clarity is provided to companies on disclosure, Hicks said. In 2011, the SEC issued disclosure guidance around cybersecurity risks, advising that companies “should disclose the risk of cyber incidents if these issues are among the most significant factors that make an investment in the company speculative or risky.” The SEC has since formed a cyber unit intended to combat cyber-based threats, but the guidance on disclosure has not been updated in over six years, Hicks said.
“Many issuers struggle with both the timing of disclosure around a material breach as well as determining exactly how much to disclose, especially if there is an ongoing investigation related to the breach,” he explained. “Greater clarity and guidance from the SEC will certainly trigger broader reporting around this topic.”
As is pointed out in the report, cybersecurity issues not only present a risk to a company's reputation, but can also mean backlash for company execs. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. CEO Amy Pascal was fired after the 2014 hack of that company, for instance, and Equifax Inc. CEO Richard Smith retired in the wake of his company's massive breach announced in September. But with the sudden departure earlier this year of former Yahoo Inc. general counsel Ron Bell behind the tech giant's two massive breaches, this risk has reached the legal department as well.
“Cybersecurity is a mainstream board-level issue—senior-level executives and the GC of organizations must protect the assets of the business,” Hicks said. “The GC needs to work closely with the board to ensure a proper cybersecurity plan is in place. In addition to the CEO, the GC has been the fall guy after some major cyber events, including the recent Yahoo and Equifax breaches.”
Todd Hicks, CEO of Intelligize. Courtesy of Intelligize.In recent years, the number of companies identifying cybersecurity as a risk factor in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings has grown tremendously. But there appears to have been a leveling off in 2017, which may indicate that companies “have blinders on” when it comes to disclosing cybersecurity risks, according to a new report.
From 2012 to 2016, the number of companies reporting cybersecurity as a risk factor in SEC filings has grown 277 percent, the report from Intelligize Inc. shows. Despite that increase though, the report, which is based on all public company SEC filings from 2012 to this year, indicates that there's still only a relatively small proportion of all public companies—38 percent—citing cybersecurity as a risk factor in quarterly and annual filings.
What's more, the report said, while by 2016, 1,662 public companies reported cybersecurity was a risk factor, as of Oct. 31 of this year, that number had only seen a slight bump to 1,680 companies
The slowdown in disclosing cyber as a risk may indicate one of two things, Todd Hicks, CEO of Intelligize, said in an email. It means companies “either they have blinders on—or they are deliberately not acknowledging the risks because they don't want to tip off potential hackers,” he said.
But Hicks added that he expects to see more reporting from companies in the coming years. “For the 62 percent of public companies not disclosing, I would expect that number to get smaller over the next few years, especially as the SEC gets stricter on rules around specific risk factor disclosure,” Hicks said.
And this is particularly true if clarity is provided to companies on disclosure, Hicks said. In 2011, the SEC issued disclosure guidance around cybersecurity risks, advising that companies “should disclose the risk of cyber incidents if these issues are among the most significant factors that make an investment in the company speculative or risky.” The SEC has since formed a cyber unit intended to combat cyber-based threats, but the guidance on disclosure has not been updated in over six years, Hicks said.
“Many issuers struggle with both the timing of disclosure around a material breach as well as determining exactly how much to disclose, especially if there is an ongoing investigation related to the breach,” he explained. “Greater clarity and guidance from the SEC will certainly trigger broader reporting around this topic.”
As is pointed out in the report, cybersecurity issues not only present a risk to a company's reputation, but can also mean backlash for company execs.
“Cybersecurity is a mainstream board-level issue—senior-level executives and the GC of organizations must protect the assets of the business,” Hicks said. “The GC needs to work closely with the board to ensure a proper cybersecurity plan is in place. In addition to the CEO, the GC has been the fall guy after some major cyber events, including the recent Yahoo and Equifax breaches.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250