Texas In-House Lawyers Making More, Spending Less
Everything's bigger in Texas, including in-house attorney pay.
December 15, 2017 at 05:30 PM
4 minute read
Shutterstock.com
Another reason to not mess with Texas: The average total compensation of an in-house attorney in Texas is $377,909, nearly $50,000 more per year than the national average of $321,000, according to recent statistics from HBR Consulting.
Researchers recently broke out the Texas numbers from HBR Consulting's 2017 Law Department Survey released in mid-November. HBR advises law departments on productivity and profitability.
But before Texans start gloating too much, they should know that HBR's data also showed New York's in-house counsel earn an average of $480,596 per year, or nearly $100,000 more than Texas in-house lawyers.
In-house counsel earnings data included salary, cash bonus and long-term incentives. The data came from 424 in-house attorneys across 14 Texas companies from 2016 to 2017. Seven percent of the companies have revenue of $3 billion or less, while 29 percent have revenue greater than $40 billion.
The data showed that legal demand in Texas is running well above the national average. About 92 percent of respondents said their companies' legal needs increased over the past year, compared to 82 percent in the national survey.
But in-house legal departments in Texas do not seem to be spending more or hiring more to cope with that demand.
While outside counsel spend remained flat nationally, Texas law departments saw a 3 percent decrease in outside spend. Lauren Chung, HBR managing director, said Texas companies are bringing more work in-house.
And total legal spending, both in-house and outside, decreased 11 percent among Texas law departments while remaining flat nationally.
When asked about law department growth, 50 percent of Texas respondents reported a decrease in total staff, while 10 percent reported no change. Nationally only 39 percent reported a decrease while 18 percent said staffing remained unchanged.
So if more work is coming in-house, hiring is down, and outside counsel spend is decreasing, how is all that work getting done in Texas?
Chung said she just conducted a roundtable with Texas participants who confirmed what the figures show. She attributed some of the figures to so many oil companies being included in the mix, during a down economy for the oil industry.
“There's been more of a rigorous effort among Texas companies to be thoughtful in spending,” Chung said. “They are being much stricter in their outside counsel convergence process, and much more aggressive in cost control methods.”
She said Texas law departments are being more strategic about what work their lawyers do, and looking for tools that will allow clients to do more for themselves.
There is also more thinking about how work is being sourced internally, Chung said, prioritizing work so that it is being pushed to the right levels “and creating capacity for senior lawyers to handle the more complex work.”
She sees law departments focusing more on technology and automating. “They are harnessing knowledge in a way that people have ready access to information and can deliver results quicker,” she said.
And they are increasingly using data analytics to help streamline how contracts are handled, to identify improvements in efficiency and to make key decisions.
“There is a lot of investment in these other areas without adding head count or increasing outside counsel spend,” Chung said. She noted that the national survey had indicated an increased use of data analytics as well.
This story has been corrected to fix a quote from Lauren Chung.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readEx-Six Flags CLO Lands New C-Suite Post—This Time as HR Chief
Trending Stories
- 1Winston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
- 2U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe Stepped Down
- 3Slideshow: Judges Who've Retired But Didn't Step Down
- 4Husch Blackwell Hires Former Adobe Counsel to Oversee AI Advisory Offering
- 5CFPB Finalizes Rule Removing Medical Debt From Credit Reports
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250