Law Firms Are Finally Making Moves to Standardize and Streamline Billing Processes
For years, law firms have experienced pushback from clients on their billing processes. And while firms are working to redefine the billable hour and…
December 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For years, law firms have experienced pushback from clients on their billing processes. And while firms are working to redefine the billable hour and implement new solutions like e-billing technology and data analytics platforms, there's still a lot of work to be done.
To gain better insight into law firms' billing practices and the steps they're taking to improve them, HBR Consulting surveyed 25 top law firms and found that clients are becoming more dependent on performance metrics. In fact, 67 percent of law firms have had a client ask them to provide real-time views into unbilled time, while 58 percent have had a client or other third-party vendor request at least one billing audit in the past year. Nearly half (48 percent) of firms have a month-end time entry deadline combined with a daily or weekly requirement to ensure timely invoicing.
Additionally, 76 percent of law firm respondents have also implemented incentives to ensure timely hours entry. Almost all (96 percent) firms quantify the amount of time their legal support staff spends on the total billing process, up from the 85 percent that did so last year. Clearly, law firms are trying to streamline the billing process, with 60 percent of firms planning to change legal support staff involvement in the billing process over the next three years.
Sharon Quaintance, senior director at HBR Consulting, sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss the findings and how firms can better manage and improve their billing practices. The intensity with which corporate counsel have pushed back on law firm billing has increased, and is often based on internal pressures to reduce expenses and/or meet quarterly financial forecasts. In addition, corporate counsel business management skills have become more sophisticated over time, with law departments adding more legal operations personnel. According to Quaintance, as the Association of Corporate Counsel has continued to emphasize examples of pricing and billing improvements, more law departments have sought to use these more creative approaches, often with the goal of better predictability and transparency.
In general, the legal industry is notoriously slow to adapt to change. Some experts have even blamed the bar associations for having created barriers to entry, while others have focused on the lack of business acumen among both inside and outside counsel.
“But, in nearly all the cases that I have observed, advancements in pricing and billing solutions–or lack thereof–come down to leadership,” she explained. “Whether it is inside or outside counsel, it takes top-down commitment to change attorney behavior related to pricing, time entry and billing practices, along with a deft hand that can identify opportunities and maneuver obstacles to make meaningful improvements.”
In addition, there are more improvements needed than simply just changing billing, per Quaintance. The most advanced law firms understand that they must effectively manage the entire client matter lifecycle–from understanding their clients' needs and expectations about pricing and on-going communication through correctly setting up the new matters, complying with clients' guidelines and providing budget-to-actual transparency. When done correctly, communication is the key part of the success of any new solutions. Changes often occur slowly because some law firms' leadership teams have not educated their attorneys about clients' expectations regarding management of the entire client matter lifecycle.
According to Quaintance, the key law firm billing practices are: time entry by timekeepers; creation of pre-bills for attorneys to review; edits to pre-bills for consistency, accuracy and integrity; e-bill or distribute bill; and verify successful e-bill submission and correct and/or resubmit if needed.
“There is considerable focus on improving billing-related policies and procedures particularly related to more prompt time entry, standardized narrative entries and additional quality control steps. Many firms are assessing their current billing staff using more clearly defined performance metrics and investing in training as an on-going area of focus,” she explained.
So, how can firms better manage and improve their billing practices?
The greatest opportunity for improvement rests with the executive partner team, per Quaintance. In many cases, law firm CFOs know what needs to be done to meet or exceed clients' expectations, as well what management changes are needed to improve billing staff structures, processes and technologies. However, the finance team needs the support of leadership and ultimately the partnership to make the necessary changes – using industry best practices and data on client expectations can support these change management efforts.
She added, “Clearly defined policies, plans and unwavering top-down support are critical to the overall success of improved billing practices.”
Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for Corporate Counsel and InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation, and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
In-House Gurus Say Inattention to Human Side of Tech Adoption Can Derail Best-Laid Plans
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250