How the #MeToo Movement Has Impacted Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
Over the past 10 years, sexism has been constant. it is simply a view that women are inferior to men and should play subordinate roles at work and…
January 02, 2018 at 01:18 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Over the past 10 years, sexism has been constant. it is simply a view that women are inferior to men and should play subordinate roles at work and in the home. In the workplace, the expression of sexist resentment of women's presence has becoming more intense as economic pressures and perceived competition for scarce positions of power and influence have grown.
In an effort to shed light on the culture of sexism, abuse and harassment and how it is being affected by the #MeToo movement, we were lucky enough to sit down with Katz, Marshall & Banks attorney Carolyn Wheeler, who has vast experiencing representing women who have asserted claims against judges. According to Wheeler, the culture has grown more tolerant of crude language and open discussion of sexual content so these themes are more pervasive in the forms of harassment of women that are common today.
“The #MeToo movement has brought the depth, breadth and perniciousness of sexist hostility to women into public consciousness,” she explained. “While the harassers we have heard about have been accused of demanding or expecting sexual favors from women, what this demonstrates is their lack of respect for women as human beings.”
Sexual abuse and harassment allegations is not more rampant, per Wheeler, but the current broad proliferation of stories of abuse demonstrates the power of feeling the support of a group and realizing you are not alone and that you did nothing to deserve or provoke the treatment you received.
Are women just becoming brave enough to step forward now versus years ago? Wheeler doesn't know that courage was lacking in the past. In fact, consider what happened when Anita Hill testified–whether she was believed or not, the whole world saw that her allegations did not lead to punishment of her harasser. In general, women have always known that they likely would not be believed; that it would be embarrassing to discuss what happened; and above all that they would suffer extreme retaliation, often the end of their career aspirations.
If a woman reported a man at work for sexual harassment 20 years ago, would she have lost her job?
“The reality then and now is that if a woman complains about a man in a position of greater power or influence, nothing will be done to him and she will be transferred, marginalized and even fired. Retaliation has always been a real and legitimate concern,” she explained.
According to Wheeler, if a woman is willing to follow through, the legal consequences for employers who ignore complaints of harassment can be extreme. Although federal law caps the damages at $300,000, under many state laws there are no limitations, and juries have awarded substantial verdicts in egregious cases. In addition, that cap applies to each individual claim, so in cases of tolerance of serial harassers the economic costs could multiply exponentially.
So, how can women protect themselves? According to Wheeler, by complaining internally and to federal and state agencies and by speaking up to other women in their workplaces to get the support and reassurance that they are not alone. She added, “If someone fears retaliation she may want to get legal representation to navigate the situation.”
Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for Corporate Counsel and InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation, and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readEx-Twitter Exec Sues for $20M, Says Musk Fired Her as 'Petty Retribution'
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250