The Impact of Tax Law Reform on People and Businesses in 2018
Tax reform will have extensive impact on the business climate in the near and long term, with companies focused on navigating many changes and nuances,…
January 11, 2018 at 04:32 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Tax reform will have extensive impact on the business climate in the near and long term, with companies focused on navigating many changes and nuances, in addition to new risk and compliance challenges.
Brian Newman, tax partner at CohnReznick, and Joy Matak, tax director at CohnReznick, recently sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss the seismic shift of the landscape and specific tax reform developments. He shared changes related to the tax landscape, including the impact on trusts and estates, state and local tax, international tax, the not-for-profit area and changes related to executive compensation.
The reduction of tax rates for corporations and individuals should have a positive impact on the economy for the foreseeable future, according to Newman. With a significantly lower corporate tax rate, businesses will be prone to reinvest in infrastructure, hire more employees and increase their dividends to shareholders. A larger workforce armed with more disposable income means more spending–and for any company selling product, spending is the key ingredient in fueling growth.
“The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is one of the most significant pieces of tax legislation ever,” he said. “But the potential impact is still mainly a mystery to corporate and individual taxpayers, since there is very little guidance on how many of the new provisions apply to them. It is important that all taxpayers take time now to focus on how each of these provisions may affect them.”
However, any new tax laws also brings new risks, especially relating to compliance. Many companies are uncertain on how they can apply the new tax laws due to the lack of interpretive authority of the new provisions. There may also be a risk of investment decisions being made based on the consequences instead of the merit of the investment itself.
So what are the big changes related to the tax landscape in 2018?
For businesses, some of the big changes impact pass-through businesses like S corporations, LLCs, partnerships and sole proprietors. These entities will receive a 20 percent deduction equal to 20 percent of “qualified business income.”
But, per Newman, there are several limitations and this benefit will be phased out for professional service businesses owned by individuals with taxable income of more than $157,500 (single filers) or $315,000 (joint filers). Effective Jan. 1, the tax rate for C-corporations was reduced to 21 percent from the maximum rate of 35 percent. In addition, the corporate AMT has been repealed. Taxpayers can now, subject to certain limitations, deduct 100 percent of the costs of certain assets acquired to be used in a trade or business.
For 2018, the maximum, which allows an election to deduct certain depreciable assets, is increased from $500,000 to $1 million. On the other hand, “like-kind” exchanges are limited to real property and the deduction for fringe benefits and entertainment expenses has been eliminated or reduced. Finally, the Section 199 deduction is repealed.
“For individual taxpayers, the big changes include revised Individual rates and brackets, with generally lower rates, with the top rate dropping from 39.6 percent to 37 percent,” he explained. “These tax cuts are scheduled to expire after 2025. There is no change to the preferential long-term capital gains tax rate. The standard deduction is increasing to $24,000 from $12,700 for married taxpayers filing jointly, and from $6,350 to $12,000 for single taxpayers. For eligible taxpayers, the child tax credit is increased from $1,000 to $2,000 and a $500 credit is provided for certain non-child dependents.”
The new legislation limits an individual's itemized deduction for state and local taxes to $10,000 in 2018 which, for many individuals, could increase their federal income tax liability. For other taxpayers, the reduced state and local tax deduction may have limited impact if they were subject to the AMT and were not receiving the benefit of state tax deductions anyway. And mortgage interest deductions for new purchases of first or second homes will be capped at $750,000 in mortgage debt for mortgages incurred after December 15, 2017.
According to Matak, the new limitation of the tax deduction is receiving significant pushback from legislators in several states. There is proposed legislation in high tax states designed to circumvent the $10,000 state and local tax deduction limitation on an individual's income tax return. Additionally, New York has just announced its intention to sue the federal government due to the limitation on the deductibility of state and local taxes.
She said, “Reform around trust and estate taxation comes as welcome relief for high-net-worth individuals and family businesses. The tax reform law doubles the amount that can be exempted from federal estate tax to around $11 million per taxpayer, which was effective Jan. 1. Opportunities abound to accomplish significant asset protection and business succession goals but planning must be tailored to each taxpayer's unique facts and circumstances.”
Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for Corporate Counsel and InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation, and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublicans Urge US Banking Agencies to Provide Clarity in Merger Review Process
4 minute readNew Corporate-Transparency Laws to Require 'Mountain of Filings'
Does TikTok's Algorithm Fall Under Section 230 Immunity? 3rd Circuit to Decide
White House's AI Executive Order Opens the Door Wide to New Rules, Enforcement Actions
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Charlie Javice Fraud Trial Delayed as Judge Denies Motion to Sever
- 2Holland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
- 3With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Attorneys See Potential for Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 4Trump Signs Executive Order Creating Strategic Digital Asset Reserve
- 5St. Jude Labs Sued for $14.3M for Allegedly Falling Short of Purchase Expectations
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250