Three Emerging Technologies with the Biggest Data Security Risks
From the rise of cloud-based data in the past decade to the more recent surge of personal devices on business networks, vulnerabilities are everywhere.Today,…
January 16, 2018 at 02:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
From the rise of cloud-based data in the past decade to the more recent surge of personal devices on business networks, vulnerabilities are everywhere.
Today, e-discovery and digital forensics experts work with a variety of corporate and legal businesses and, so, are fortunate to be exposed to many different client systems over the course of their careers. Many InfoSec professionals may be exposed to only a handful of companies, mostly focused within the same industry, e-discovery and digital forensics experts become talented at switching focus between many different technology environments across a variety of industries, within a relatively short period.
Jason Park, certified cyber forensics professional and director of forensic services at BIA, sat down with Inside Counsel to discuss three emerging technologies that are posing some of the biggest security threats.
Home Automation. First, IoT presents interesting challenges for security and will certainly open up new challenges for discovery and forensics. Everyone knows the security risk is substantial. Just as the Target breach from 2014 captured the vulnerability of an HVAC system, so might outside parties break into the software behind your smart door locks or speaker system. But what kind of data can those speakers access?
Virtual Assistants. Secondly, with the rise in popularity of devices like Alexa and Google Home, there comes one interesting question: How much user history data is stored locally on these devices?
Fitness Wearables. Lastly, not the most obvious in terms of technology to be forensically searched, fitness wearables manage a lot of data about the wearer, including location-to-location tracking, time of location, heart rate, even messaging on some. With more people starting to wear monitors on their bodies, wearables could play key roles in future legal cases.
Per Park, in the rush to bring products to market as quickly and inexpensively as possible, much of the necessary security design and testing is incomplete. And manufacturers often use mass production techniques and rely on cheap hardware and outdated operating systems, leaving devices susceptible to cyberattacks.
So, what are the biggest trends in data security for 2018?
“Because human error accounts for 90 percent of cyber claims, and until companies take cybersecurity training seriously, I believe we will continue to see phishing and ransomware attacks be one of the biggest trends,” explained Park. “Hardware and software flaws will also continue to influence the market, especially given the recent announcement of Meltdown and Spectre, two CPU flaws that affect nearly every device we own.”
As IoT devices, devices like home security cameras, door locks and alarm systems that are connected to a network, become more prevalent in industries across the board, Park believes the risk of IoT breaches will continue to rise, as just one misconfigured device can put an entire company's data in jeopardy.
“As we move closer to the reality of autonomous vehicles, it will be interesting to see how internet-connected vehicles are, or could be, exploited,” he said. “Imagine taking your car in for an oil change, only to have a nefarious mechanic upload malware to the car's processor. All your connected communication, like geolocation information, and even physical access to the car and potentially to your garage door opener, could be exploited and sold.”
These days, while newer technologies pose significant security risks, it's some of our oldest technologies that still present the biggest threat. For instance, power plants and chemical processing facilities often use very fragile and sometimes vulnerable systems. Their process controls, which might have a 20- to 30-year life span, simply were not designed with cybersecurity in mind.
Amanda G. Ciccatelli is a Freelance Journalist for Corporate Counsel and InsideCounsel, where she covers intellectual property, legal technology, patent litigation, cybersecurity, innovation and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMarriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
2024 Ransomware Payments Poised to Shatter Record, as Gangs Target 'Big Game'
2 minute readCleared in HP Fraud Trial, British Tech Tycoon Mike Lynch Now Missing at Sea
Trending Stories
- 1'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 2States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 3$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 4'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 5Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250