Aetna to Pay $17M to Settle HIV Privacy Class Action Suit
Thousands of HIV patients whose names and conditions were revealed by glassine envelopes sent through the mail would share in a $17 million settlement that Aetna Insurance Co. has agreed to pay upon judicial approval to resolve claims that the company failed to protect the individuals' privacy.
January 17, 2018 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The Aetna world headquarters in downtown Hartford, Connecticut, on September 22, 2011. Aetna is the third-largest health insurance provider in the United States. Photo credit: shutterstock
Thousands of HIV patients whose names and conditions were visible through glassine envelopes sent through the mail will share $17 million that Aetna Insurance Co. has agreed to pay in settlement of claims that the insurer failed to protect the individuals' privacy.
The settlement, upon judicial approval, would resolve a nationwide class action breach of privacy lawsuit filed in federal court in Philadelphia in August over, ironically, notices mailed as part of a settlement of a previous class action claiming the health insurer's mail order requirement for medications violated HIV patients' privacy.
The lawsuit was brought on behalf of current and former Aetna customers taking medication to treat HIV or PrEP, a pre-exposure prophylactic medication. The lead plaintiff is a man using a pseudonym who, according to court papers, feared “severe harm” would befall him should his true identity be revealed.
According to the proposed settlement agreement, Hartford, Connecticut-based Aetna would pay $17,161,200 to the plaintiffs—a base payment of at least $500 to each of the nearly 12,000 patients who were sent the glassine window envelopes, through which instructions for filling HIV medications were clearly visible. This settlement amount will also be used to pay $75 each to customers whose private health information Aetna improperly disclosed to its lawyers and mail vendor.
The settlement also allows patients who were sent the allegedly invasive notices and who can demonstrate financial or nonfinancial harm to submit claims for additional monetary awards.
In the lead plaintiff's case, one of his family members found the mailing and believed he was living with HIV and had not confided in his family. He was then forced to admit his condition to his family, according to the complaint.
“HIV still has a negative stigma associated with it, and I am pleased that this encouraging agreement with Aetna shows that HIV-related information warrants special care,” the lead plaintiff said in a statement released by the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania. The nonprofit public interest law firm that works to protect the legal rights of people living with HIV in Pennsylvania and South New Jersey teamed up with Philadelphia-based class action firm Berger & Montague and the Legal Action Center on the suit.
In an emailed statement, Aetna said the company is implementing measures to ensure that an incident like this does not happen again.
“Through our outreach efforts, immediate relief program and this settlement we have worked to address the potential impact to members following this unfortunate incident,” according to the statement.
Frederick Santarelli of Elliott Greenleaf in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, and Matthew Kanny and Donna Wilson, partners in the Los Angeles office of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, represented Aetna in the settlement.
The incident giving rise to the agreement is believed to be the world's largest data breach involving HIV privacy, according to Ronda Goldfein, executive director of the AIDS Law Project.
“The fear of losing control of HIV-related information and the resulting risk of discrimination are barriers to health care,” Goldfein said in a statement. “This settlement reinforces the importance of keeping such information private, and we hope it reassures people living with HIV, or those on PrEP, that they do not have to choose between privacy and health care.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250