New Year, New Legal Department: 5 Points of Focus for In-House Lawyers in 2018
Whether it's shutting off ever-present mobile devices or taking a close look at company culture, there's plenty for general counsel and their colleagues to set their sights on in 2018.
January 18, 2018 at 11:41 AM
3 minute read
2017 was a year of litigation battles, regulatory updates, rapid technological growth and enough scandals to make any general counsel nervous. In the new year, legal departments will have to adapt to all the change that continues to come their way. Corporate Counsel spoke to a group of experts to get five recommendations for in-house counsel looking to prepare for all that 2018 is sure to bring: 1. Post-Weinstein, Look at Company Culture As the initial shock of #MeToo turns into a widespread demand for change, in-house teams should be at the forefront of making a difference. Experts said legal departments should analyze sexual harassment trainings for their effectiveness, and that if a harassment claim does arise, victims should feel their their allegations are being fully investigated and that they won't be penalized for speaking out. 2. Expect to Merge and Acquire Under Trump's Tax Plan If money currently held overseas is brought back to the U.S. to take advantage of a lower corporate tax rate, this may lead to domestic expansion, according to experts. For American companies already looking to expand, the bill could boost incentives to do so domestically rather than globally -- whether that's opening an new office or acquiring a competitor in another state. 3. Boost Efforts to Attract and Retain Top Talent Jamy Sullivan, executive director of Robert Half Legal, said her firm's 2018 Legal Salary Guide found that a lot of in-house attorneys are worried they'll lose staff in the coming year. But there are solutions. Legal staff are drawn by perks such as telecommuting and flexible schedules -- signs work life balance is increasingly important-- and by challenging work with opportunities for growth. 4. Use Tech Tools to Cut Costs and Spot Trouble Early One trend from 2017 is carrying over to the new year -- legal departments are expected to do more with less. In-house counsel can boost efficiency and cut costs by ditching the old-fashioned ways of working to try the latest tech, experts told Corporate Counsel. Artificial intelligence and predictive technologies can also allow lawyers to spot legal troubles before they arrive, saving their companies time and money. 5. But Know When to Turn Off the Tech New tools boost efficiency, experts said, but they could actually hurt departments long-term if constant emails are causing distractions throughout the day. During meetings, focus on what's being said versus scrolling through messages, and know when it's better to speak in person, says Susan Hackett, CEO of Legal Executive Leadership, a law practice management consultancy. She's even seen some GCs block off certain times of the day to read and respond to emails.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIt Was a Wild Ride: Check Out the Top In-House Stories of 2022
Challenges Met, Lessons Learned: In-House Leaders Share Top Takeaways From 2021
Compensation, WIPL and Hiring: The Top 10 Corporate Counsel Stories of 2021
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250