7-Eleven Raids Portend 24-7 ICE Enforcement
This week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) served a hundred 7-Eleven stores nationwide with notices of inspection and detained twenty-one undocumented workers. ICE will require the 7-Eleven stores to produce documents showing 7-Eleven required work authorizations from their employees.
January 19, 2018 at 12:32 PM
4 minute read
This week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) served a hundred 7-Eleven stores nationwide with notices of inspection and detained twenty-one undocumented workers. ICE will require the 7-Eleven stores to produce documents showing 7-Eleven required work authorizations from their employees. The 7-Eleven action comes a few days after the Trump administration announced that they are ending a humanitarian program, known as Temporary Protected Status, for approximately 200,000 El Salvadorans who have been allowed to live and work in the United States legally since devastating earthquakes hit their country in 2001.
The action against 7-Eleven stems from a four-year old case against a 7-Eleven franchisee in New York. While the action this week may have been a surprise to some, the Trump administration's commitment to immigration enforcement shouldn't be. Last year, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a new directive on immigration enforcement which focused on re-entry and entry prosecutions and mentioned 8 U.S.C. §1324, which addresses smuggling and harboring, the core statute used for worksite enforcement cases.
ICE's worksite enforcement program focuses on criminal prosecution of employers of undocumented workers, particularly companies who utilize unauthorized workers as a business model, mistreat workers, engage in identity fraud, human trafficking, or smuggling, or participate in other criminal conduct. Prosecutors use the smuggling and harboring statute for worksite enforcement cases, which can impose significant jail time for employers, depending on the number of unauthorized workers. And the smuggling and harboring statutes have a lower standard of proof—instead of requiring knowledge, recklessness is sufficient. The smuggling and harboring statutes also provide for asset forfeiture, which creates a significant incentive for ICE to prosecute the cases. The reinstatement of the worksite enforcement program means that employers of undocumented workers can face serious consequences, both in terms of potential fines and jail time.
Sessions' 2017 directive made it clear that immigration enforcement (including worksite enforcement) would become one of the U.S. Department of Justice's priorities. And it did. As Corporate Counsel predicted following the election, the Trump administration is making good on Trump's campaign promises to expand immigration enforcement, which has already seen a 40 percent increase in deportation arrests across the nation.
Top ICE officials have warned that the 7-Eleven action is the first of many and should send a strong message to U.S. employers that they will be held accountable for hiring unauthorized workers. Companies should take a proactive approach to increased worksite enforcement. Here are three steps to get started:
- Companies should ensure they have effective policies and procedures in place to deal with immigration compliance. The company's hiring process should include clear procedures on immigration screening to ensure compliance with immigration requirements. The government offers the E-Verify program to assist companies with immigration compliance screening of potential employees.
- After implementing policies and procedures, companies should educate employees on expectations of the compliance program. Companies should identify employees whose job description includes handling immigration issues (e.g., HR management) and provide training on the immigration process, potential issues, and appropriate responses.
- Monitoring is essential to program effectiveness. Companies should develop a plan for responding to compliance failures and conduct audits to ensure employees follow the rules. For example, the company could audit I-9 forms (the forms that employers are required to use to collect information on employment eligibility) for technical and procedural errors and adequate documentation. Companies should also make sure employees know how to confidentially report suspected unauthorized employment practices through a helpline or some other reporting mechanism.
A company's immigration compliance program will vary depending on the company's size and business environment. Addressing compliance and immigration enforcement will help address issues proactively and minimize exposure in the event of a compliance failure.
Ryan McConnell and Stephanie Bustamante are lawyers at R. McConnell Group—a compliance boutique law firm in Houston, Texas. McConnell is a former assistant U.S. Attorney in Houston who has taught criminal procedure and corporate compliance at the University of Houston Law Center. He also prosecuted a number of significant worksite cases while an AUSA resulting in millions of dollars in fines and criminal charges against individuals. Bustamante's work at the firm focuses on risk and compliance issues in addition to assisting clients with responding to compliance failures. Send column ideas to [email protected]. Follow the firm on Twitter @RMcConnellGroup.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250