Want to Make Meaningful Improvements in Legal Ops? Try Small Ones
Lucy Bassli, until recently assistant general counsel of legal operations and contracting at Microsoft Corp, said at Legalweek 2018 that the most dramatic legal operations improvements can sometimes be simple process tweaks.
January 31, 2018 at 06:38 PM
2 minute read
At a time when legal departments are constantly looking to be more efficient, it's not uncommon to hear about new tools and technologies that can go a long way in cutting costs and speeding up processes.
But there doesn't always have to be a massive and tech-heavy overhaul to see improvements, according to Lucy Bassli, former assistant general counsel of legal operations and contracting at Microsoft Corp.
Bassli, who left Microsoft earlier this month to start law firm and consultancy InnoLegal Services, joined a panel at ALM's Legalweek 2018 on Tuesday to discuss how legal departments can best utilize legal operations professionals.
Contract management, e-billing tools and the like may be needed to improve the way a legal department functions. But there “doesn't have to be a leap to technology right away,” Bassli said. “There actually doesn't ever have to be a leap to technology, depending on the size of the department and the volume of the work you have.”
“There's so much talk about innovation this week, as there should be, but innovation does not equal automation,” Bassli said. “Sometimes it can, but right now, especially for where the legal industry is, there's a ton of innovation that can happen with just optimizing processes, just rethinking your resource allocation, the who's doing what type of work, who's doing which parts of the process.”
Bassli explained that in certain circumstances, the best way forward for a legal department can be as simple as rethinking a particular approach. “Why go through an implementation of any kind if you could tweak the process?” she asked.
For example, Bassli recalled a time when she was involved in conversations about mapping the contracting review process used at Microsoft. The realization was that, when checking different databases, it was consistently the case that the database that typically didn't have the information needed was looked at first, simply out of habit. Right away, Bassli said, the process was changed to reflect what would be most efficient. It was a simple tweak, but it's “these tiny things,” she noted, that can amount to success.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Don't Know Everything': GCs Say Success Leading Nonlegal Functions Starts With Humility
5 minute read'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
Trending Stories
- 1Giving Back to My Community as a PVLA Volunteer
- 2Civil Reservations: An Important Tool for New Jersey Courts and Criminal Defendants
- 3People in the News—Nov. 18, 2024—Hamburg Rubin, Offit Kurman
- 4How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'Leaders Must Be Good Listeners,' Says Dan Summerlin of Woods Rogers
- 5Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250