With Less Than Four Months to Go, Global Companies Still Lack GDPR Plans
According to new data from EY, as the GDPR implementation date draws near, many companies are still less than prepared.
January 31, 2018 at 07:38 PM
3 minute read
Shutterstock.com
Time is ticking for global companies to comply with upcoming changes to data protection laws in the European Union—and many are still unprepared, a new survey finds.
In less than four months, on May 25, the General Data Protection Regulation will go into effect for any company doing business in the EU. GDPR broadens the definition of “personal data,” requires that organizations receive explicit consent before processing users' data and includes “the right to be forgotten,” among other major legal changes.
Yet London-based professional services firm EY's third biennial Global Forensic Data Analytics Survey found only one-third of companies currently have a GDPR compliance plan in place. Others were studying GDPR, had heard of it but had not taken action or had never heard of the new regulation.
“GDPR is a very complex issue and, at the end of the day, you know it's causing companies to revisit where and how they store data and to what purpose,” Todd Marlin, EY's Americas Forensic Data Analytics and Data Science leader, told Corporate Counsel. “It's not a trivial undertaking.”
The survey drew on the responses of 745 executives from 19 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Africa and the Middle East and the Americas. EY does not have data on how many of the respondents' global companies do business in Europe.
Predictably, respondents in Europe were the most likely to have a plan to comply with GDRP legislation, with 66 percent saying they had one in place. Africa and the Middle East came in second, with 27 percent of executives responding they had a plan. In the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region, 13 percent and 12 percent reporting having plans, respectively.
“The low response rates indicating preparation in the Americas and Asia could point to a lack of preparation or awareness of the legislation, or perhaps an incomplete understanding,” Marlin said.
He added that planning for GDPR could be out of the scope of the duties of the individual executive surveyed.
Despite low rates of preparation, global respondents expressed concern over GDPR and the data issues the new legislation will address. The survey found 78 percent of respondents stated data protection and data privacy compliance were a concern.
And it appears that some companies are placing more value on forensic data analytics tools in the months leading up to GDPR's effective date.
Results showed a 51 percent increase in average annual spend on FDA per respondent, compared to 2016's results, with 13 percent of respondents currently using FDA to reach GDPR compliance. Another 52 percent said that they are in the process of analyzing FDA tools that could help achieve compliance.
Companies are seeking more advanced FDA tools, with 14 percent already using robotic process automation (RPA) to manage legal risks and 39 percent more planning to use RPA in the next year. Artificial intelligence is also popular, with 38 percent of executives planning to use AI as an FDA tool in the next 12 months.
“Businesses that adopt FDA technologies can achieve significant advantages, benefiting from more effective risk management and increased business transparency across all of their operations,” Andrew Gordon, EY's Global Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services leader, said in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250