With Less Than Four Months to Go, Global Companies Still Lack GDPR Plans
According to new data from EY, as the GDPR implementation date draws near, many companies are still less than prepared.
January 31, 2018 at 07:38 PM
3 minute read
Time is ticking for global companies to comply with upcoming changes to data protection laws in the European Union—and many are still unprepared, a new survey finds.
In less than four months, on May 25, the General Data Protection Regulation will go into effect for any company doing business in the EU. GDPR broadens the definition of “personal data,” requires that organizations receive explicit consent before processing users' data and includes “the right to be forgotten,” among other major legal changes.
Yet London-based professional services firm EY's third biennial Global Forensic Data Analytics Survey found only one-third of companies currently have a GDPR compliance plan in place. Others were studying GDPR, had heard of it but had not taken action or had never heard of the new regulation.
“GDPR is a very complex issue and, at the end of the day, you know it's causing companies to revisit where and how they store data and to what purpose,” Todd Marlin, EY's Americas Forensic Data Analytics and Data Science leader, told Corporate Counsel. “It's not a trivial undertaking.”
The survey drew on the responses of 745 executives from 19 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Africa and the Middle East and the Americas. EY does not have data on how many of the respondents' global companies do business in Europe.
Predictably, respondents in Europe were the most likely to have a plan to comply with GDRP legislation, with 66 percent saying they had one in place. Africa and the Middle East came in second, with 27 percent of executives responding they had a plan. In the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region, 13 percent and 12 percent reporting having plans, respectively.
“The low response rates indicating preparation in the Americas and Asia could point to a lack of preparation or awareness of the legislation, or perhaps an incomplete understanding,” Marlin said.
He added that planning for GDPR could be out of the scope of the duties of the individual executive surveyed.
Despite low rates of preparation, global respondents expressed concern over GDPR and the data issues the new legislation will address. The survey found 78 percent of respondents stated data protection and data privacy compliance were a concern.
And it appears that some companies are placing more value on forensic data analytics tools in the months leading up to GDPR's effective date.
Results showed a 51 percent increase in average annual spend on FDA per respondent, compared to 2016's results, with 13 percent of respondents currently using FDA to reach GDPR compliance. Another 52 percent said that they are in the process of analyzing FDA tools that could help achieve compliance.
Companies are seeking more advanced FDA tools, with 14 percent already using robotic process automation (RPA) to manage legal risks and 39 percent more planning to use RPA in the next year. Artificial intelligence is also popular, with 38 percent of executives planning to use AI as an FDA tool in the next 12 months.
“Businesses that adopt FDA technologies can achieve significant advantages, benefiting from more effective risk management and increased business transparency across all of their operations,” Andrew Gordon, EY's Global Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services leader, said in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readAfter Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250