Plaintiffs Lawyer Calls for Bar Probe of Michigan State In-House Counsel
In an interview with Corporate Counsel, David Mittleman slammed MSU in-house attorney Kristine Moore for her treatment of an investigation into the actions of Dr. Larry Nassar, who had been employed by Michigan State.
February 06, 2018 at 04:07 PM
5 minute read
A plaintiffs attorney wants the Michigan State Bar to do some digging into the Michigan State University in-house lawyer who investigated a Title IX sexual abuse complaint against sports doctor Larry Nassar in 2014.
Lansing attorney David Mittleman, of the Church Wyble law firm, spoke up on the issue at an open court hearing last week.
“In my 33 years I have never had the ethical responsibility of reporting a lawyer for committing an act that I believe is contrary to the ethical standards of the State Bar of Michigan,” he said, according to a recently released hearing transcript.
Mittleman then began to explain. He started to describe an email sent by the MSU lawyer, Kristine Moore, to Dean William Strampel, Nassar's supervisor at the MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine. In the email, Moore wrote she sent one version of her investigative report to Nassar, and another version “without the substantive text in the conclusion” to the woman who had filed the abuse claim against Nassar.
But before Mittleman could finish his sentence, he was interrupted by Patrick Fitzgerald, a former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois and now a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in Chicago. Fitzgerald is MSU's defense counsel.
The court cut in and asked the relevance of Mittleman's statements about ethics. When he tried again to raise the ethical issue of the two different reports, the court told him to “take it up with the State Bar of Michigan.”
In an interview with ALM this week, Mittleman said he plans to do just that.
Mittleman's firm represents at least 80 of the more than 200 plaintiffs making claims against MSU, USA Gymnastics and a training facility called Twistars. Nasser was involved with all three. MSU defense lawyers and trustees have accused some plaintiffs attorneys of grandstanding for the press.
But Mittleman reiterated, “I intend to report her [Moore] to the bar. I have never in 33 years of practice reported any one. But at the conclusion of this litigation, I do intend to report her.”
Mittleman said he is waiting in hopes that he will be able to question Moore under oath about the two versions of the report.
“Our Title IX expert has never heard of there being two versions of a report,” he said. “It violates the premise of Title IX, which is treating everyone equally. She [Moore] was supposed to be an independent person doing the investigation.”
Moore has been assistant general counsel at the university since late 2014, but before taking that post she was an attorney and assistant director in MSU's Office for Inclusion, which investigated Title IX complaints.
The report Moore gave to Nassar and the university contained language calling Nassar “a liability to the school” because what he called treatments were perceived as sexual abuse. Moore deleted the liability language in the copy she gave to the complainant.
Both versions cleared Nassar of wrongdoing, saying he was medically treating the women, not abusing them. The conclusion was mostly based on Moore's interviews with three of Nassar's colleagues at MSU, who vouched for him.
“She couldn't find another expert who didn't know Nassar to ask about the treatments?” Mittleman asked. “This state is full of good medical schools who would have told her the truth about the so-called 'treatments.'”
Moore's investigation failed “on multiple layers,” Mittleman said, “and with the egregious results of 40 to 50 more women being molested.”
Besides Mittleman's criticism of Moore, an MSU trustee also has called for the resignation of the school's general counsel, Robert Noto. So far Noto remains in the job. Interim President John Engler has said he will propose some “changes” to the board of trustees at their next meeting Wednesday.
In other developments:
- On Monday, Nassar received his final sentence of 40 to 125 years from Eaton County Circuit Court in Michigan. That sentence will run concurrently with a 40- to 175-year sentence handed down earlier in another county court. Both state sentences begin after a 60-year federal sentence for child pornography.
- Michigan Attorney General William Schuette continues with a special prosecutor's criminal investigation into how MSU handled the Nassar complaints. On Feb. 2 his office executed search warrants at the university.
- In response to the scandal, Michigan legislators have introduced a bill that would allow the governor to disband the board of trustees at MSU and two other public universities in January, and appoint all new slates.
- Several Nassar defense lawyers have said they and their families have received death threats, according to the Detroit Free Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
6 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Top Governor's Office Executives Drafted Letters Threatening Florida TV Stations Over Abortion Ads
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250