Tips on Transforming a Legal Career From Inside-Out
While the legal industry has undergone dramatic shifts and changes in recent times, it is still not a very common occurrence to find a long-time inside counsel making the leap into the world of outside law firms.
February 09, 2018 at 12:59 PM
4 minute read
While the legal industry has undergone dramatic shifts and changes in recent times, it is still not a very common occurrence to find a long-time inside counsel making the leap into the world of outside law firms. Changing career directions is never an overnight process and always involves a fair amount of soul searching. It goes without saying that corporate attorneys can often develop a very strict and limiting view of a career path that can prove to be particularly resistant to change.
If there is a growing commitment to making a change, the best first initial step is to talk to friends and trusted colleagues in the legal field. Even more distant acquaintances in the field can be a good sounding board. Their objective views and encouragement can be a springboard to self-reflection and even rediscovery. We are all guilty of taking for granted the person we see in the mirror every morning and it can be invaluable to have another set of eyes offering a different perspective.
In-house lawyers can offer an outside law firm so much more than just a book of business. The approach to client satisfaction and deep knowledge about the ways in which corporate culture works can prove extremely valuable to firms who are always striving to achieve higher standards of client satisfaction. The former in-house lawyer can be a key ambassador offering thoughts and insights on the expectations from the client-side and the internal pressures and issues that clients might be managing. Within a law firm, sharing best practices about billing and legal operations management is also a great benefit to the firm.
If an attorney is truly committed to turning a legal career “inside-out,” here are some key tips to consider:
- Find the right outside match: Just like with corporations, not all outside law firms are alike. Carefully research the culture and histories of each firm and determine which might present the best fit. A law firm must be forward-thinking to appreciate the many values that an experienced in-house counsel will bring.
- Tap into an entrepreneurial spirit: Inside attorneys might not have a book of business that they can bring, but there are so many other experiences, contacts and professional perspectives they can effectively harness to quickly develop these opportunities.
- Understand the new office dynamics: Not all authority and direction flows down from one general counsel in a law firm. Rather, several different partners in the firm hold distinctive decision-making authorities and responsibilities.
- Be open and accessible: Corporate culture may have the tendency to become hierarchal and rigid, but outside law firms often value being nimble and flexible. Reach out to co-workers and actively offer assistance and insights on a variety of client issues.
- Be the ambassador: Attorneys who have been inside counsel need to understand how valuable and unique these perspectives can be to a law firm. Help partners stay one step ahead of any client challenges by sharing a steady perspective and offering analysis of what the client might need and the possible motivations behind specific requests and demands. Maintain a commitment to spreading the word on client-centric best practices and offering unique advice on achieving these goals.
Change is never easy and it can be quite difficult for a corporate counsel, who is locked into a highly defined daily schedule and routine, to take a second look at the legal profession and its many other opportunities. While attorneys generally have a reputation for being risk-averse, making a bold change and taking a professional risk can actually be extremely rewarding and could ultimately enrich a career in many ways that might not have been expected. Sometimes what seems like a reinvention can actually prove to be a rediscovery that leads to a sense of renewed professional fulfillment.
Steven P. Seltzer was a senior in-house litigation attorney at MetLife and, after a successful 25-year tenure, took the leap into the world of private law firms and joined Moritt Hock & Hamroff in Garden City, New York.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250