Wynn GC 'Turned a Blind Eye' to CEO's Misconduct, According to Lawsuit
Kim Sinatra allegedly had a hand in concealing a multimillion-dollar settlement with a woman who claimed former Wynn Resorts CEO Steve Wynn forced her to have sex with him.
February 09, 2018 at 12:08 PM
4 minute read
The fallout continues after The Wall Street Journal revealed former Wynn Resorts Ltd. CEO Steve Wynn's alleged decades of sexual misconduct. A shareholder derivative suit filed this week takes aim at Wynn, the company's board of directors and general counsel Kim Sinatra.
The suit, filed Tuesday in the Clark County District Court in Nevada, alleges that while Wynn “engaged in a pervasive pattern of egregious misconduct,” the board at the Las Vegas-based company as well as Sinatra “turned a blind eye” and continued to stand behind the casino mogul.
The complaint outlines the ways in which Sinatra, who did not immediately return requests for comment, allegedly had a hand in concealing a multimillion-dollar settlement with a woman who claimed Wynn forced her to have sex.
The company declined to comment on the suit.
In 2005, the WSJ reports, a manicurist who worked at Wynn Las Vegas was forced by now 76-year-old Wynn to have sex. The manicurist was later paid a $7.5 million settlement from Wynn's personal funds and that the former CEO deliberately “kept it secret so it would not distract” from business opportunities, the suit claims.
The 42-page complaint then points to court filings in a separate case involving Wynn and ex-wife Elaine Wynn, which contain claims that the latter has known about the settlement since 2009 and that Sinatra also knew about it.
In a March 2016 court filing, Elaine Wynn said she learned her ex-husband had made a “multimillion-dollar payment after apparently being threatened with allegations of serious misconduct on company property against a Wynn Resorts employee.” When she made inquiries about this with Sinatra, the general counsel stated that “Mr. Wynn had decided that the matter should not be disclosed to the board or other company counsel,” according to the filing.
This settlement, the shareholder derivative suit notes, was also not disclosed “on advice of counsel” to Massachusetts gaming regulators when they were considering issuing a gaming license to Wynn Resorts in 2013. “This concession demonstrates that the company, including Ms. Sinatra, knew of the allegations of egregious misconduct involving the company and actively concealed it from the Massachusetts gaming regulators,” the complaint reads.
Sinatra “breached her fiduciary duties by concealing and failing to police, investigate and act as the company's chief legal officer to address the known credible allegations of intentional egregious misconduct and violations of the law,” by Wynn, the complaint alleges, all the while reaping substantial compensation and benefits from the company.
Sinatra, who is one of the highest-paid executives in Las Vegas, according to Vegas Inc., is known as a close confidant to Wynn, with a former employee telling the Las Vegas Review-Journal that she is one of the closet executives to him. Court filings call her Steve Wynn's “co-conspirator.”
The suit also calls into question Wynn Resorts' corporate governance practices, noting that the board has come under fire before for “weak corporate governance and deference to Mr. Wynn.” The complaint cited Wynn's pay package and said he has been permitted to use corporate jets for extensive personal travel. And the company apparently leased Wynn's personal art for $1 per year while picking up the tab for insurance, security and taxes.
Wynn, citing the “avalanche of negative publicity,” stepped down as CEO on Tuesday. Wynn Resorts, meanwhile, now faces scrutiny from gambling regulators who weren't made aware of the $7.5 million settlement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250