Fintech Roundup: Pump and Dump Schemes, Toughening Regulators
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Conference of State Bank Supervisors have all made headlines recently for their actions on financial technology.
February 22, 2018 at 01:27 PM
5 minute read
It's only February, but the world of financial technology is already off to a roaring start this year. The red-hot cryptocurrency market has grabbed headlines, and fintech companies are accelerating the rate of change in how banking and personal finance get done.
This surge of activity is prompting plenty of action at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors.
Here are a few of the latest fintech legal and regulatory developments:
SEC:
As promised in the virtual currency hearings that took place earlier this month before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, the chairs of the SEC and the CFTC are following through with more enforcement actions against alleged bad actors in the space.
The SEC Wednesday announced charges against a bitcoin-denominated platform, BitFunder, and its founder Jon Montroll. According to the SEC's complaint, BitFunder was operating as an unregistered securities exchange and “defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their funds and failing to disclose a cyberattack on BitFunder's system that resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.”
“Platforms that engage in the activity of a national securities exchange, regardless of whether that activity involves digital assets, tokens or coins, must register with the SEC or operate pursuant to an exemption,” said Marc Berger, director of the SEC's New York regional office, in a press release Wednesday. “We will continue to focus on these types of platforms to protect investors and ensure compliance with the securities laws.”
Earlier this month, the SEC announced the suspension of trading for three companies “amid questions surrounding similar statements they made about the acquisition of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology-related assets.”
The three issuers were questioned by the SEC about their business operations and the value of their assets, according to the Feb. 16 press release announcing the action. One of the companies was allegedly delinquent in filing reports with the commission.
“This is a reminder that investors should give heightened scrutiny to penny stock companies that have switched their focus to the latest business trend, such as cryptocurrency, blockchain technology or initial coin offerings,” said Michele Wein Layne, director of the Los Angeles regional office, in the announcement.
CFTC:
The CFTC revealed this week that it has established a cooperation arrangement with the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K. this week, but that's not all the agency has been up to. Last week, the CFTC released a customer protection warning about pump-and-dump virtual currency schemes.
For the uninitiated, the CFTC outlines in its advisory what investors need to watch out for: “Pump-and-dump schemes are mostly anonymous and are organized in public chat rooms or via mobile messaging apps. They are coordinated efforts to create phony demand (the pump) and then sell quickly (the dump) to profit by taking advantage of traders who are unaware of the scheme.”
The advisory goes on to say that this type of manipulation is plaguing the virtual currency space and typically occurs on platforms that offer a variety of coin pairings.
CSBS:
One of the biggest issues that has emerged since the introduction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's proposed national special purpose charter for fintechs last year is growing tension between federal and state banking regulators. Although the so-called fintech charter has not been finalized, fintech firms have adamantly voiced frustration about the lack of uniform regulations from state to state.
In response, the CSBS has filed suit against the OCC and claimed it lacks authority to create the fintech charter. But outside that legal fight, state banking regulators have received the message that uniformity in regulations would be helpful for fintechs.
John Ryan, president and CEO at the CSBS, wrote in a Feb. 15 blog post that “as nonbanks modernize the financial services industry, we as regulators are modernizing the state regulation of nonbanks. … States have been exploring how fintechs and other nonbanks can become licensed more quickly and scale regionally or nationally more easily, while regulators provide increased focus on core issues of risk. We are mindful that our approvals, when we give them, must set a high standard that creates confidence in consumers who wish to use fintechs and other new firms.”
Ryan's commentary was published shortly after seven states announced they would introduce standardization in the licensing process for money services businesses.
How will it work? “If one state reviews key elements of state licensing for a money transmitter—IT, cybersecurity, business plan, background check and compliance with the federal Bank Secrecy Act—then other participating states agree to accept the findings,” the CSBS wrote in a Feb. 6 announcement.
In a Feb. 21 report, Idaho's banking regulators indicated that the state intends to join the banking compact, which so far includes Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250