Teamwork Pays Off for Aon, Outside Firms in Building More Efficient Legal Processes
Aon and its outside partners at Sidley Austin and Foley & Lardner teamed up to make a big difference through Lean/Six Sigma.
February 23, 2018 at 04:52 PM
5 minute read
Cineberg/Shutterstock.com
As the chief operating officer of the law department at Aon Corp., Audrey Rubin is responsible for budget management, negotiation of outside legal fees and much more.
In 2015, she discovered a way to boost efficiency for her department in all those areas, leading to big savings and stronger relationships. It's a process she's continuing to build in-house.
It all started for Rubin when she agreed to attend a Legal Lean Sigma Institute training, which focused on process improvement and project management in the law. Catherine Alman MacDonagh, the institute's co-founder, met Rubin years before and over time convinced her the training would be useful.
After the session, Rubin told MacDonagh that she'd learned good lessons, and wanted to find a way to apply them to address some of the issues facing her own legal department. The challenge was, her in-house colleagues at Aon and the company's outside firms didn't know the Legal Lean Sigma concepts.
To fill this knowledge gap and simultaneously create new efficiencies at Aon, Rubin and MacDonagh began preparing a pilot training for members of Aon's legal department and their preferred law firms.
“Rather than get trained in a hypothetical vacuum, we're training together and then starting to solve our problems as part of the training,” Rubin said.
Rubin noted some recurring problems springing up in Aon's relationships with the outside firms, and asked her colleagues about issues they'd noticed. Some of the most prominent issues were lags and miscommunication in billing and subpoena processes.
Then, she and MacDonagh converted Legal Lean Sigma's hypothetical training scenario issues into the real ones Aon faced with its firms. This way, they'd have a chance to use process improvement and in-person communication to make a change.
They started with two firms, Sidley Austin and Foley & Lardner, each of which got their own training session with Aon.
“Aon approached the relationship partners here at Sidley, explained why they were interested in this model and how it might be beneficial for these partnerships Aon had,” said Ami Wynne, a partner at Sidley who was involved in the training. Wynne says her team had never done anything like this before and went in with an open mind.
On the training days—one with Sidley, one with Foley & Lardner—Aon legal team members broke into groups with people from the respective firms.
The groups were divided into “stakeholders,” or those involved in a process on either end. One set of stakeholders, for instance, consisted of law firm attorneys who bill time, law department attorneys who review time, and billing personnel working to cut down the number of rejected invoices. In some cases, Aon staff were talking to firm employees who they'd emailed, but never met in person.
The groups spent the day learning process management and discussing how those skills could be applied to make billings, M&A transactions, and subpoena and contract processes more efficient. Rubin says the teams were able to then see which steps in each of these processes were unnecessary and cut them out.
Meeting and speaking in-person, group members were able to figure out each individual's role in the process, eliminating the need for multiple forwarded emails or bounce-backs and reducing errors, according to Rubin. Processes were streamlined as participants set clear steps and lines of communication—for example, Aon decided to use collaborative platforms for processing subpoenas rather than bounce the documents around. She said the lessons continued even after the training day was over.
“Each team has to assign itself a leader to keep it moving, so there is homework, but then we come back together for a half a day,” Rubin said. “We report out what we've been able to accomplish in terms of the process improvements and then we set up a monthly report.”
After the half-day meeting, Rubin says the teams continue to touch base by phone with a monthly report that allows the groups to spot issues and improve, until the process improvement strategies become ingrained.
And the hard work has paid off for Aon. According to Rubin, the Lean/Six Sigma Process Design decreased the total dollar amount of rejected invoices for legal work by 41 percent and decreased the average subpoena cycle time by 44 percent from 175 days in 2014 to 98 days in 2015. She says aside from just increasing efficiencies, the changes have led to fewer errors.
The project has also strengthened Aon's relationship with the firms, Rubin and Wynne say.
“Even though Aon is a client we know very well and have very strong relationship with, there are always areas we can work together to enhance,” Wynne said.
The lessons learned in the training days and follow ups have extended outside Aon's relationship with the two originally selected firms. Rubin says her department has plans to go through the same training with other outside firms to address specific issues. She's also had legal staff approach her since the training with new, innovative ideas to improve process management at Aon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250