Navigating the Legal Complexities of a Digital Health Transaction
Whatever the long-term future for life sciences, in house lawyers and their business counterparts as well as outside advisors who are able to navigate the convergence of business and legal issues surrounding the life sciences and technology industries will have a competitive advantage over those who ignore the parallel convergences that are taking place, continuing to focus instead on life sciences and technology as distinct and separate fields.
February 28, 2018 at 04:06 PM
4 minute read
Digital health is now at the forefront of deal activity in the life sciences and health care sector. The acquisition earlier this week by Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Apsis of France-based Orthotaxy, a software developer at the cutting edge of robotic-assisted orthopedic surgery, and the $118 million equity funding announced earlier today of privately held prostate surgery robotics company Procept BioRobotics, are just the latest in a series of digital health transactions that are transforming the life sciences and health care industries.
Last week, Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche agreed to shell out a stunning $1.9 billion to acquire Flatiron Health, which has transformed a traditional electronic medical records business into an advanced digital platform providing data to optimize oncology-focused clinical trials through partnerships with the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute and hundreds of community oncology practices.
Grail, an early cancer detection start-up that raised $1.3 billion in its Series B funding round in 2017, focuses on the overlap of life sciences, cloud computing, big data and artificial intelligence.
Johnson & Johnson was itself involved in one of the earliest landmark transactions in digital health when its Ethicon Endo-Surgery subsidiary agreed to collaborate with Alphabet's Verily Life Sciences. The Verb Surgical joint venture, established in 2015, employs robotics, visualization, advanced surgical instrumentation, data analytics and connectivity to build a next-generation open-surgical platform.
In house counsel, business development professionals and investors say the increasing convergence of the life sciences and technology industries is creating opportunities and challenges in equal measure. In both industries, practitioners are now required to solve issues related to the ownership of shared data, the protection of patient privacy and complex regulations.
Life sciences companies seeking to improve health care quality and patient outcomes as they innovate around the generation and sharing of data are driving much of this activity, along with payers such as private health care insurance companies and the federal government's own Medicare and Medicaid programs. All share a goal of finding a way to monetize health care data and create personalized or individualized care plans.
So what do these trends suggest? First, that the promotion of value-based health care, underpinned by the individual patient experience, is now paramount. How this ultimately is achieved remains unknown. Big data and artificial intelligence will surely each play a role. But how the Food and Drug Administration should regulate in a world where, for example, artificial intelligence or machine learning may change the standard of care given to a patient remains unknown. Will companies have to seek FDA approval each time their robot-assisted surgical device adapts itself to a new surgical setting, or will the regulators take a more practical outcome- or risk-focused view?
Some believe that drugs, small molecules and biologics, will one day be commoditized and that it will be the software—algorithms uniquely tailored to a patient—that determine just how the drugs or a sequence of therapies are administered. By extension, the continuous upgrading and refinement of such software would be what ultimately drives value in the health care sector.
Whatever the long-term future for life sciences, in house lawyers and their business counterparts as well as outside advisors who are able to navigate the convergence of business and legal issues surrounding the life sciences and technology industries will have a competitive advantage over those who ignore the parallel convergences that are taking place, continuing to focus instead on life sciences and technology as distinct and separate fields.
Kristopher Brown is a partner in the corporate & securities practice group in the New York City office of Dechert LLP, where he focuses on M&A, private equity and venture capital transactions. Dechert was involved in legal aspects of each of the Orthotaxy, Verb Surgical and Grail transactions referenced above.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250