In-House Lawyers and DC Regulators Can Work Together, Report Says
It's time for GCs and their colleagues to head to Capitol Hill to make their mark on emerging regulatory frameworks, a new report from Crowell & Moring says.
March 02, 2018 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
Shutterstock.com
Legal departments need not fear Washington, D.C. Or at least that's the message from the authors of a new Crowell & Moring report on regulatory challenges in-house counsel will face this year.
The law firm released its annual Regulatory Forecast this week. This year's edition, titled “Digital Transformation: The Sky's the Limit,” explores how companies and their attorneys can help shape regulatory outcomes around cutting-edge technologies during a time of transition under President Donald Trump.
“Explosive innovation is propelling rapid economic and societal change around the globe,” said Philip T. Inglima, Crowell & Moring chair, in a press release Wednesday. “How this digital transformation is realized will be determined in large part by regulation—and right now, innovators have a unique opportunity to help shape that regulatory framework.”
Advanced technologies, including blockchain, self-driving cars and 3-D printing, are offering new opportunities for companies across all industries. At the same time, they may pose a need for new regulation in many areas, including antitrust, enforcement, government contracts, health care, intellectual property, insurance, privacy and cybersecurity, tax and international trade, according to the report.
The report suggests that even new tech startups can't ignore regulators. They must understand the regulatory “baseline,” the report said, no matter how young the company is. With automated vehicles, as an example, companies need to understand Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. “If you're a new tech entrant, that might not be right up your alley. Now it must be,” the report stated. “You want to make sure you're talking the same language as the people who will have regulatory control over much of what you do.”
And with issues like cybersecurity, it doesn't matter which industry you're in. Noncompliance comes at a cost, according to the report. That's why the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for example, have provided guidance in this area.
“There are some really extraordinary developments in technology,” said Richard Lehfeldt, partner at Crowell & Moring and co-editor of the forecast, in an interview this week. “Companies and regulators need to think of ways to sync these things up.”
One way, he said, that companies can easily work to find solutions is by having in-house lawyers work closely with the in-house regulatory and policy employees, if they have them.
“Sometimes they're merged, sometimes they're not. The coordination between those functions is where the rubber hits the road,” Lehfeldt said.
His other crucial advice for in-house counsel is: “Don't be scared of Washington.”
Lehfeldt said this is especially true in an administration that he believes is in favor of innovation and is trying to be flexible with weeding out unnecessary regulation.
“Other than those companies committing heinous federal crimes, Washington isn't a place to be afraid of,” he said. “If a solution is presented, they engage.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250