Cigna-Express Scripts Deal: Health Care M&A Scrutiny May Continue in 2018
Health insurer Cigna has announced plans to buy pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts Holding Co. for $52 billion, the latest tie-up in the health care industry that could be challenged by both the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, the two agencies charged with antitrust enforcement.
March 07, 2018 at 02:57 PM
4 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
Health insurer Cigna Corp. has announced plans to buy pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts Holding Co. for $52 billion, the latest tie-up in the health care industry.
But in joining forces, the companies may not have an easy road in front of them. That's because both of the U.S. government's antitrust agencies are likely to continue their trend of aggressively challenging health care mergers, according to a new Crowell & Moring report on regulatory challenges various industries will face this year.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz represented Cigna, of Bloomfield, Connecticut, while Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Holland & Knight represented Express Scripts. None of the firms responded to requests for comment for this report by deadline.
Express Scripts, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, was the last big independent pharmacy benefits manager with 80 million prescription plans, so completion of the deal would leave none left for smaller insurers, according to the New York Times. That could mean even more scrutiny by regulators.
The health care portions of the law firm's annual Regulatory Forecast, titled “Digital Transformation: The Sky's the Limit,” explore how companies can help shape regulatory outcomes in an era of cutting-edge technologies.
“The U.S. government has made it a top priority to make sure that any consolidation in the health care industry doesn't hurt competition, and it has been aggressive in trying to block mergers that it believes will hurt consumers,” according to the health care portion of the report, co-authored by Crowell & Moring antitrust partners Joseph Miller and Alexis Gilman.
As examples, Miller and Gilman cite the U.S. Department of Justice's two victories in this area last year: separate federal judicial rulings blocking Aetna Inc.'s $37 billion takeover of fellow health insurer Humana and Anthem's $54 billion proposed merger with Cigna.
In addition, in late 2016, the Federal Trade Commission also won antitrust battles when separate appellate court decisions sided with the agency's efforts to block two mergers of hospital systems: Chicago's Advocate Health Care Network's proposed combination with NorthShore University HealthSystem, and the tie-up of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, area, the report stated.
Although all of these cases were blocked, they provide “helpful intelligence” about the kinds of acquisitions and mergers companies may successfully pursue in the rapidly changing health care landscape, Miller and Gilman said.
“The most important takeaway is that 'horizontal' combinations of head-to-head competitors, as all the blocked cases were, may face significantly greater antitrust hurdles than 'vertical' mergers, in which the merging companies have complementary businesses and don't compete,” they wrote.
Given this heightened level of federal scrutiny of planned mergers, health care companies wanting to “bulk up through acquisitions” may consider turning to their state legislatures for so-called state action immunity, Miller and Gilman said. In such cases, they add, states have legislatively created a state system of active regulatory oversight that displaces federal antitrust laws.
“But the U.S. government isn't likely to sit back and watch if too many more hospital systems that it would have otherwise blocked from merging decide to seek state help,” the authors said.
Added Miller: “If you see a continuing trend toward hospitals seeking immunity to get deals done, you can anticipate a counterreaction from the federal government.”
Other areas of health care regulation that companies may expect to see in the upcoming year include the exploration of blockchain technology as a means of addressing the significant challenges associated with managing large amounts of health data; and continuation of the strong focus on opioid-related cases in the investigation of health care fraud, according to the report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250