Columbia Sportswear VP of Legal Wants Law Firms to Fix the Way They Run
Jennifer Warner told a conference on legal innovation and disruption that she believes firms need to get down to business.
March 15, 2018 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
Columbia Sportswear Co. vice president of legal Jennifer Warner opened Thursday's Summit on Legal Innovation and Disruption with some pointed advice for traditional law firms—start acting more like businesses.
“You have to start thinking about operating like a business,” she said. Too many lawyers, Warner explained, are just ”showing up and being smart and charging hourly rate” without a clear business strategy to improve clients' experience and meet their needs.
Warner spoke to the crowd of around 160 legal professionals, including 65 corporate counsel, at SOLID in San Francisco about the changing role of in-house leaders and their evolving relationships with outside counsel. She criticized firms, saying they are increasing rates annually without a matched increase in performance.
Members of her legal department have to work for pay increases above their 2.5 percent baseline, she said, and top performers can earn up to 3 percent, but law firms often raise rates by 6 percent without delivering outstanding performance. In-house counsel have to show excellent, innovative performance for higher pay, she said, and firms should be held to the same standard.
“That's what irks me, they are just so not acting like a business in any way shape or form,” she said.
In addition to her comments about law firm service, Warner also told the conference that now, more than ever, general counsel are expected to be not just lawyers, but informed, savvy business leaders. She said she's seen CLOs sitting at the table alongside the CEO, CFO and COO more often than she used to.
“Lawyers have got to be business people and that changes how we're providing services to our internal clients,” Warner said.
A key component to this change is developing a strategic budget and sticking to it, according to Warner. But she said that this emphasis on budgeting isn't necessarily about doing more with less. Instead, it's about ensuring that the legal department is using resources in the most effective way, and getting the most out of its spend.
She said her own goal is to spend the same amount in her department each year, but as efficiently as possible.
“I want to take that same amount of money and I want to spend it better,” she said. “I'm going to be looking at my total combination of resources. What are my outside counsel doing? What are my alternative providers doing? And what is my in-house counsel doing, and do I have the right mix? And the answer right now is probably not.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Am Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250