In-House Leaders Say Their Companies Can Be Change Agents for Diversity
"We need general broader power structures to change," said Marie Oh Huber, senior vice president and general counsel at eBay. "I feel like those of us who have that voice, that ability, that power, we need to push for that change."
March 19, 2018 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
Credit: VLADGRIN/Shutterstock.com
A lot of companies talk a big game about the importance of diversity initiatives. But on Friday, in-house leaders at the Hispanic National Bar Association's Corporate Counsel Conference in San Francisco spoke about how companies — and outside law firms — can walk the walk.
One panel featured in-house leaders from Wal-Mart Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., eBay Inc., and Aduro. They discussed their departments' strategies to foster inclusive spaces and boost diversity.
“When you [add] money and requirement[s] and take tough stances as the paying clients, it's amazing how things change,” said David Hubbard, vice president and deputy general counsel of Verizon. He said when Verizon has cautioned firms not to pitch his company without having women and minorities on board, outside counsel make changes because they see a potential loss of business.
Several panelists said they've had conversations with outside counsel and set standards for diverse teams. They've also pushed to ensure that people of color on diverse teams are actually getting credit for the work they do, and being put in front of the client in a substantive way. Marie Oh Huber, senior vice president and general counsel at eBay, said she makes a point to call women and people of color at firms when she has business, so they'll get the credit for bringing that matter in.
Sometimes conversations with law firms about diversity have been disappointing, Blaine Templeman, executive vice president and general counsel of biotech company Aduro, said. He noted that part of the problem could be in-house reliance on certain firms, and an unwillingness to switch to outside counsel that's lesser known but more diverse, including women or minority-owned firms.
That narrow view also holds true for law school recruits, Hubbard said. He's heard many firms argue they can't find people of color to recruit, while only looking for law students at predominantly white institutions.
“How many historically black or Hispanic colleges are you going to? Are you only going to Harvard, Yale and Columbia? Because now you're competing for the [same people]. They're there, but there are only so many,” Hubbard said. “You've got to broaden your pool or you're not going to see any change.”
The lawyers said their companies are also working to increase the pipeline of people of color to law schools and STEM degrees, starting at various stages. Aduro provides scholarships to underrepresented groups at law schools, while Hubbard said Verizon is “playing the long game” and investing in STEM programs for elementary students. According to Oh Huber, eBay is involved in initiatives for multiple age groups.
But it's not just getting diverse talent into law. It's making sure that people of color and women are paid and promoted at rates equal to their white male counterparts.
“How do we as an organization make sure there is pay equity? We've heard a lot about gender, but [what about] pay equity in terms of how we're treating members of our team,” Oh Huber said.
According to Oh Huber, data might be used here, but it's also important to make sure everyone in the legal department feels truly comfortable and has equal access to mentorship and growth opportunities. If that's not happening, she said, it's especially important to look at the system within the company, rather than place the burden on the diverse individual.
“We need general broader power structures to change,” she said. “I feel like those of us who have that voice, that ability, that power, we need to push for that change.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Top Governor's Office Executives Drafted Letters Threatening Florida TV Stations Over Abortion Ads
3 minute readHunter Biden Sues Fox, Ex-Chief Legal Officer Over Mock Trial Series
GC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 2'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 5Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250