Duke Energy Customers Not Lovin' Deputy GC's McDonald's Metaphor
Lawrence “Bo” Somers, deputy general counsel at the North Carolina-based power company giant Duke Energy, is facing public criticism after he compared a rate hike to the price of a McDonald's Extra Value Meal during a regulatory board hearing Monday.
March 20, 2018 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
FILE – In this Feb. 1, 2006, file photo, Duke Energy Corporate headquarters in a Charlotte, North Carolina, is shown. (AP Photo/Nell Redmond, File)
A high-ranking in-house lawyer at Duke Energy Corp. is facing criticism after he compared a rate hike to the price of a McDonald's restaurant Extra Value Meal during a regulatory board hearing Monday.
According to a report on WRAL.com, Lawrence “Bo” Somers, deputy general counsel at the North Carolina-based power giant, was responding to claims that a rate increase of $5.99 would pose financial difficulty to some when he said, “One extra Big Mac, fries and a drink.”
But a spokeswoman for the company contends the comments attributed to Somers were “distorted” and that his remarks were “misrepresented.”
Somers was speaking before the North Carolina Utilities Commission during a hearing to evaluate the company's proposed rate increase. The proposal calls for raising the fee for residential customers linked into the company's grid from $11.80 per month to $17.79 per month—an increase of $5.99, which, WRAL reported, is currently the price of a Big Mac value meal from McDonald's.
The news story reported that Somers' “metaphor struck some in the audience … as coarse.”
It quoted comments that Southern Environmental Law Center senior attorney Gudrun Thompson made after day one of the scheduled weeklong hearing adjourned Monday: “For a Duke representative to suggest that the company's low-income customers can deal with the proposed $5.99 hike in the monthly mandatory fee on their bill by eating one less McDonald's value meal per month is just insulting,” Thompson is reported as saying.
The nonprofit advocacy group SELC is one of the groups fighting the rate increase, according to WRAL. Thompson could not be reached for direct comment on Tuesday.
Somers and Duke's top lawyer, Julie Janson, executive vice president for external affairs, chief legal officer and corporate secretary, also could not be reached for comment on Tuesday.
A company spokeswoman said, however, that the comments attributed to Somers were “badly distorted,” noting that “Somers never said that customers could cover the rate increase by eating fewer Big Macs “but rather was trying to put the proposed $5.99 monthly increase into perspective.
Spokeswoman Meredith Archie also said that “comments [in the article] from certain intervenors”—presumably SELC's Thompson, the only person besides Somers and Archie directly quoted in the story—”misrepresented” Somers' remarks.
Somers “expressed empathy with customers who have testified that they cannot afford such a $5.99 monthly increase,” Archie said in an email. “An official transcript will be available in the coming days that will clarify the issue.
“I can assure you that Mr. Somers did not intend to offend anyone with this comparison. Duke Energy doesn't take any rate increase lightly, and we are committed to providing customers with reliable and increasingly clean energy at the lowest possible price.”
Somers joined Duke's legal department in 2001, working his way up the ranks to deputy GC, a position he has held since February 2013, according to his LinkedIn profile.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Policy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
The FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250