For Legal Departments 'Swimming in Data,' Getting Behind the Dashboard Can Help
"The dashboards provide a very effective way to determine or create what people call actionable insights. You want to use the data to inform and drive decision-making," said Scott Fuller, director of legal operations at Applied Materials.
March 23, 2018 at 02:47 PM
5 minute read
Now more than ever, legal departments are dealing with a plethora of data—around matters handled, rates paid, and much more. But not all legal departments have that data sorted in a clear, visual way that makes it usable for decision-making.
The use of dashboards is an increasingly popular way for legal operations teams to organize data. But every company trying to implement these tools does so a little bit differently.
“The reason everybody is chasing dashboards is we are swimming in data,” said Scott Fuller, director of legal operations for Santa Clara, California-based Applied Materials Inc. “The dashboards provide a very effective way to determine or create what people call actionable insights. You want to use the data to inform and drive decision-making. [Dashboards] are very visual, so it makes it easy to see relationships in the data.”
Applied Materials' legal department chose the DIY route to dashboards, an effort that started about a year ago. Before that, the department had plenty of data, but lacked ways to make sense of it. The company has been creating its own dashboards for about a year, Fuller said, with programs manager Archana Kiri leading the charge.
The creation of multiple dashboards using Tableau was a success, and it helped the department make more informed decisions. Both Fuller and Kiri will be speaking about their experiences at next month's Corporate Legal Operations Consortium conference in Las Vegas.
For those new to this area, Kiri gave a talk about “Dashboards 101,” offering tips to departments thinking of building their own.
“Start with the problem statement—what are you trying to measure, what do you want from the data? And from there on it becomes kind of clear,” Kiri said. She added it's necessary to have clean data and to reach out to others at the company, especially IT, which can help in the beginning of the process.
Creating the first dashboards can be the hardest part, she said, and after that the learning curve becomes easier. Since her first dashboard, which focused on fiscal data drawn from e-billing, Kiri's been asked to make many more.
The company's GC loved the first one, Fuller said, and soon even more legal department members wanted their own dashboards, with a focus on data that was relevant to them.
“It takes a long time to do the first one, but once you've done one, they start popping up like popcorn,” Fuller said.
The Applied Materials legal department has now created dashboards around a whole slew of metrics including legal expenses and in-house expenses as percentage of revenue, late billing by firm and investigation cycle times.
Applied Materials chose to create its own dashboards because the option provided through its e-billing system wasn't compatible with the company's unusual fiscal calendar, and it was hard to find an outside tool that aligned with their year. The company is large enough to have the resources and IT department often necessary to start and maintain successful dashboards.
But for smaller legal departments that don't have the time or resources to spend months (or even years) on dashboard development and maintenance, it can make more sense to use customized analytic software from a third party, said Kevin Clem, the managing director and leader of the law department consulting practice for HBR Consulting, which operates the dashboard Counsel Command.
Though small to medium-sized companies are more likely to go the outside vendor route, he's also worked with a number of large companies' legal departments that want organized, visual data but do not want employees using their time to create and maintain dashboards.
“It runs the gamut from those who have already tried dashboards and are looking for an advanced solution that is more sustainable, and those who realize they've got the data but they want insight, and haven't thought about how to use this data to create insights and report out through the rest of the company,” Clem said.
His team starts with a baseline set of metrics that can be individualized for each department, depending on what's most important to the company. Individual users may also see different data when logging on—the GC and the director of legal ops rely on different metrics to make daily decisions, and that's reflected in the dashboard.
“Focus on what decision or what insight that dashboard should provide or answer,” Clem said. “Don't expect senior attorneys to go into a tool everyday unless there's some specific action you're expecting them to take, or a question they're looking for an answer for. Think about if someone is looking to get on the phone with a law firm, what would you want them to know?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent CEO Shooting Tragedy a Reminder for Corporate Risk Assessment and Incident Response Plans
7 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Judge Sides With McDonald's In Attorney-Client Privilege Dispute With Former Executives
4 minute read'Climate-Smart Beef'?: DC Lawsuit Accuses Tyson Foods of False Advertising
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250