After MyFitnessPal Breach, In-House Counsel Should Consider Segregating Sensitive Data
This week's hack holds a simple but important lesson for legal departments about how to handle data storage.
March 30, 2018 at 04:07 PM
3 minute read
This week, sportswear apparel retailer Under Armour became the latest U.S. company to make an announcement that no company wants to have to make—its systems had suffered a massive data breach.
The Baltimore-based company revealed Thursday that approximately 150 million users of its MyFitnessPal app, which allows users to track their diet and exercise, had been infiltrated in a February hack that was uncovered by parent company Under Armour on March 25.
In a statement from MyFitnessPal, the subsidiary said that the majority of information stolen “included usernames, email addresses, and hashed passwords,” but not payment card data, because that was “collected and processed separately.”
Lawyers and cybersecurity specialists say that such a separation of private payment data, whether done on purpose or not, is helpful to minimize damage in a data breach.
“It is a good practice to separate payment systems into a different server, and to segregate sensitive data,” said Brenda Sharton, litigation partner and chair of privacy and cybersecurity at Goodwin Procter.
Robert Cattanach, a partner at Dorsey & Whitney, says that hackers often seek the “weakest link” in a company's data security. While that may initially lead to data that's not extremely sensitive, if information isn't segregated hackers can move horizontally and access private, personal data.
“There are lots of different ways to thwart the intruders, so to speak,” Cattanach said. “Compartmentalizing, siloing information is a very good idea, but you're never going to be perfectly keeping them out, no one can. The most important thing is a good detection system so that once they're in, before they can do anything, you shut them down. The third line [of defense] is don't give them much data.”
It's unclear whether Under Armour segregated MyFitnessPal's payment card information internally for security purposes, or whether the company was simply using a third-party payment processor for other reasons. Under Armour declined to comment on the breach beyond the initial announcement.
Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of privacy and data protection think tank the Ponemon Institute, says its not uncommon for companies to use third-party payment processors. He said these companies should make sure their outside providers have high data privacy and security standards.
“You want the company that is going to process your payment information to be very legitimate and to have good controls in place,” Ponemon said.
Regardless of whether companies are segregating sensitive data via third-party processors or internally, Ponemon says it's a smart move to keep important, personal data separate and harder for hackers to locate en masse.
“Then, if you hack into one system you can't get it all because you have to go to all the places [data is housed],” he said. “Network segmentation is a very good idea, especially for networks in e-commerce where you have super amounts of data.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250