Got an Ethics Question? At This Company, Employees Just Ask the Chatbot
Katie Smith is the first chief ethics and compliance officer at Convercent, and has brought with her some new ideas about how to use technology to improve E&C.
April 03, 2018 at 04:11 PM
4 minute read
Katie Smith of Convercent. Courtesy photo.
Just a couple of years ago Convercent was a company that built technologies for compliance and ethics officers, but didn't have a compliance officer of its own. Now Katie Smith has changed all that, and brought her own innovations to the job, including an interactive compliance website and an ethics “chatbot” named Cooper.
In a recent interview, Smith said she had been a customer of Convercent during her four years as a compliance officer at USAA, a financial services group known for serving members of the U.S. military. Smith wanted a certain application that she envisioned. Convercent loved her ideas, and ended up hiring her in 2016 as its first compliance officer.
Smith lobbied for, and eventually won, the addition of “ethics” to her title—chief ethics and compliance officer.
“It was important to me personally to have ethics in the title,” she said, but the company didn't agree at first. After she pointed out all the corporate ethics failures in the headlines, she said, her boss relented. “It's about building the culture and setting the tone in the organization— walking our own talk,” she explained.
Her most recent project at Convercent involved creating the company's code of ethics.
“I have written several codes of conduct, some 90 pages or more, and nobody read it,” Smith said. “My vision for this code was to take it to the 21st century.”
The new ethics code is part of Convercent's interactive website that anyone can see. It is breezy and conversational in tone, with photos of employees to illustrate some points. And if an employee, client or other interested party wants to know more, they can click on a category and delve deeper into an issue.
“I wanted to make it engaging and bite-size,” Smith said, but also complete, with the option of “drilling down to get the level of information they are looking for.”
The website also offers an electronic chatbot. Smith named it Cooper simply because, she said, the name seemed like fun. Any anonymous user can type in an issue, such as a conflict of interest, and Cooper will ask a series of about five questions. Then, if need be, the chatbot will direct the user to the proper contact in order to report or resolve the issue.
Smith said the interactive website layers on Convercent's analytics. Besides measuring the website's usage and analyzing what's on people's minds, the technology also can raise a red flag if a certain issue keeps popping up, such as sexual harassment.
“I can actually see how many people have gone into the code on any given day and identify potential issues,” she said.
Smith embraced the concept of an interactive website, she said, because “I am the entire office. I needed to find a way to make myself available to my global teammates so they have information and resources they need at their fingertips, any time night or day.”
She describes Convercent as an ethics cloud company. “Our vision is to drive ethics to the center of business,” she explained. “We want to empower ethics and compliance officers to really identify and measure the ethical health of their companies, to manage the data across programs.”
The company offers an analytics platform that can tap into email content, human resources data and other metadata to derive compliance insights and spot trends. But it is a “big picture” platform, and not an individual targeting device.
Smith, who reports to the company's CEO, said she works most closely with Convercent's in-house counsel and HR, internal audit, risk, and data privacy functions. “Data privacy is explicitly important to us,” she said, and has been the focus of her latest efforts.
Smith is also on the core team that is working to make Convercent compliant with the European Union's new General Data Privacy Regulation. “We are looking at what is the best way to comply with the regulation and still meet our customer needs,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250