Legal Departments Want to Add More In-House Lawyers, But Will They?
According to a new survey from Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, many companies like to bring on in-house talent rather than use outside lawyers, but they may not be able to in 2018.
April 03, 2018 at 09:05 AM
3 minute read
Image by Shutterstock
Most legal departments prefer to add more in-house lawyers as opposed to adding work for outside counsel, according to a new survey. But it looks like this year, many departments might not have the opportunity to bring on any extra lawyers.
Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, an executive recruiting and consulting firm, surveyed more than 500 legal professionals in the second half of 2017 for its first-ever 2018 In-House Legal Trends Survey.
According to the report, 65 percent of respondents said they prefer to add in-house lawyers versus relying on outside counsel. Thirty-three percent felt the opposite.
However, only about one-third of departments said they plan to hire more lawyers this year, according to the survey. Twenty-six percent of departments are still considering making hires, though. Another 41 percent said they definitely won't add any new in-house attorneys.
Sarah Breen, national director of in-house search with Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, said the main reason some departments won't add lawyers is due to budgetary constraints.
“I've had clients before who have wanted to hire someone but can't get budget approval,” Breen explained. “I've had multiple searches fall apart toward the end. They're about to make an offer and the budget was realigned or they didn't get approval from HR for budgeting purposes.”
One stat from the report that Breen found surprising was the desire from in-house attorneys for flexible work arrangements. Twenty-three percent of respondents said that was the most important “draw” of working for their company. This benefit and the opportunity for growth (also at 23 percent) were the top two perks listed in the survey.
Breen said opportunity for growth is something that is often discussed in initial interviews but apparently not as many are as open to sharing their views on flexible work arrangements.
“I think they don't want to come across as if they don't want to work,” Breen said. “It's something that employers need to be aware of.”
Aside from flexible work and growth, the respondents cited other incentives as well. For 16 percent, co-workers were the main draw, for 13 percent it was compensation, while 10 percent said their job makes a difference in the world. Another 5 percent listed traditional benefits such as medical and dental, while 3 percent cited nontraditional benefits such a gym or day care.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHere Are Some Answers to Employers' Many Legal Questions About the Coronavirus
8 minute readFTC Commissioner's Social Media Statement Is a Heads-Up to Advertisers, Influencers
Report: 97% of General Counsel Think a Recession Could Be Near, but Few Say They're Prepared
3 minute readTesla, CBS and United See New General Counsel: February 2019 In-House Moves
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250