Legal Departments Want to Add More In-House Lawyers, But Will They?
According to a new survey from Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, many companies like to bring on in-house talent rather than use outside lawyers, but they may not be able to in 2018.
April 03, 2018 at 09:05 AM
3 minute read
Most legal departments prefer to add more in-house lawyers as opposed to adding work for outside counsel, according to a new survey. But it looks like this year, many departments might not have the opportunity to bring on any extra lawyers.
Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, an executive recruiting and consulting firm, surveyed more than 500 legal professionals in the second half of 2017 for its first-ever 2018 In-House Legal Trends Survey.
According to the report, 65 percent of respondents said they prefer to add in-house lawyers versus relying on outside counsel. Thirty-three percent felt the opposite.
However, only about one-third of departments said they plan to hire more lawyers this year, according to the survey. Twenty-six percent of departments are still considering making hires, though. Another 41 percent said they definitely won't add any new in-house attorneys.
Sarah Breen, national director of in-house search with Special Counsel's Parker + Lynch, said the main reason some departments won't add lawyers is due to budgetary constraints.
“I've had clients before who have wanted to hire someone but can't get budget approval,” Breen explained. “I've had multiple searches fall apart toward the end. They're about to make an offer and the budget was realigned or they didn't get approval from HR for budgeting purposes.”
One stat from the report that Breen found surprising was the desire from in-house attorneys for flexible work arrangements. Twenty-three percent of respondents said that was the most important “draw” of working for their company. This benefit and the opportunity for growth (also at 23 percent) were the top two perks listed in the survey.
Breen said opportunity for growth is something that is often discussed in initial interviews but apparently not as many are as open to sharing their views on flexible work arrangements.
“I think they don't want to come across as if they don't want to work,” Breen said. “It's something that employers need to be aware of.”
Aside from flexible work and growth, the respondents cited other incentives as well. For 16 percent, co-workers were the main draw, for 13 percent it was compensation, while 10 percent said their job makes a difference in the world. Another 5 percent listed traditional benefits such as medical and dental, while 3 percent cited nontraditional benefits such a gym or day care.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHere Are Some Answers to Employers' Many Legal Questions About the Coronavirus
8 minute readFTC Commissioner's Social Media Statement Is a Heads-Up to Advertisers, Influencers
Report: 97% of General Counsel Think a Recession Could Be Near, but Few Say They're Prepared
3 minute readTesla, CBS and United See New General Counsel: February 2019 In-House Moves
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250