GE Regulatory Lawyer Michael Fitzpatrick Helping to Shape World of Tomorrow
Fitzpatrick and GE outside counsel Lisa Ellman of Hogan Lovells recently spoke with Corporate Counsel about emerging technologies.
April 05, 2018 at 05:15 PM
6 minute read
Michael Fitzpatrick is a senior regulatory lawyer at General Electric, but rather than be buried in briefs and bureaucracy all day, Fitzpatrick's work at the Boston-based company is the stuff of science fiction.
Fitzpatrick's job—officially GE's head of regulatory advocacy—is to help clear the way for GE innovations in such areas as the Internet of things. He often works closely with outside counsel, Lisa Ellman, a partner at Hogan Lovells. Both are based in Washington, D.C.
Corporate Counsel recently talked with Fitzpatrick and Ellman about the brave new world of technology they are helping to shape. They talked about four of the most rapidly evolving areas in tech that are likely to affect businesses and their in-house counsel in the next five years.
1. 3-D printing.
Fitzpatrick explained when industries do it, it's called “additive manufacturing.” And GE is making a “radical departure” from traditional manufacturing while setting a “significant milestone” in 3-D printing technology, according to the March/April issue of the MIT Technology Review.
The article explains how GE, the world's largest supplier of jet engines, is using additive manufacturing to produce a metal-alloy fuel nozzle for a new aircraft engine by printing the part layer by layer with lasers.
Fitzpatrick said the technique “can build parts used in sophisticated machinery faster and cheaper, and the parts are lighter and more durable” than plain metal. For aviation, both of those factors are critical.
He said GE is also planning printed parts for giant gas and wind turbines. And GE Healthcare has already produced printed probes used in ultrasound machines.
He added that such new technology creates a host of issues for the GE legal team to tackle—intellectual property, workplace safety, certification and assuring the free flow of data across borders.
2. Artificial intelligence and the internet of things.
Fitzpatrick said GE wants to use AI and the data it generates “to automate transportation systems, and to optimize performance of machines, whether power turbines, jet engines or health care equipment.”
AI leads to similar legal issues as additive manufacturing, he said.
Ellman added, “Automation. It's all about data, whether we are talking drones or transportation, it's about the data. Using it to make safer and more efficient processes for companies.” She said she works with companies of all sizes to help them automate their systems and safely collect data.
Among the legal questions, Fitzpatrick said, are who owns the data, and where the liability flows when an incident occurs. “Does GE, which is running the predictive analytics platform, ingesting data from one or more customers, have control over [the data], and some level of liability?” he asked. “Or do the customers and the machines that are producing the data?”
Fitzpatrick said GE grapples every day with questions about where regulators belong when it comes to data. The key, he said, is arriving at a flexible regulation that can evolve quickly as technologies change.
“Also, the world of industrial IOT is different from consumer IOT,” he noted. “With consumer IOT, you are dealing with individuals and their PII [personally identifiable information]. With industrial IOT, you are dealing with machine data, say the flow of fossil fuel through a pipeline or wind through a turbine for maximum efficiency.”
“Those zeroes and ones [machine computer data] we argue deserve a different approach from policymakers than somebody's PII, maybe even a lighter regulatory touch,” he said.
Both lawyers think many issues, including liability, might best be resolved through contracts between equally sophisticated parties, rather than by government regulation.
3. Spectrum for its own industrial LTE network, for high-speed wireless communication.
“Another area of emerging importance for GE and all industrial companies is access to spectrum. It is the lifeblood of the industrial internet of things; spectrum is the blood that flows between the organs and allows them to operate,” said Fitzpatrick.
He said GE moves huge quantities of data, and “it's not always been the case that we have the ability to access this kind of spectrum from commercial cellular carriers. They are focused on consumers. We have different needs, for long-term, interference-free, secure spectrum. Unless we have our own, we are going to be hobbled.”
Fitzpatrick said GE Digital has been working with Nokia, Qualcomm Technologies Inc. and others, including GE's industrial customers, meshing their technologies to create a private LTE network for the industrial IOT.
Changing internet policies at the Federal Communications Commission could eliminate the ability of industrials to purchase the right size bandwidth, Fitzpatrick said.
“From the perspective of the in-house lawyer, the question of spectrum as a policy issue has emerged dramatically over [the] last few years, and will only get more important over [the] next 10,” he predicted.
4. Unmanned aircraft systems, or drones.
“As someone in regulatory policy space for 25 years, this is one of the most exciting and important areas of regulatory policy right now,” Fitzpatrick said. “It will yield great social benefit, and is coming on [the] scene quickly and shaking things up.”
He said GE is using drones “to affect really precise and safe inspections of critical infrastructure.” For example, drones can inspect hundreds of miles of pipelines for defects and leaks, transmission lines, oil and gas fields, refineries, and maritime facilities such as ports and deep-water oil rigs.
“Drones can do it faster, more accurately and efficiently, and more safely than sending [a human] inspector into those situations,” Fitzpatrick said. “GE is going hard into the automated inspection business. We call it Avitas.”
The next big concept, he said, is designing an unmanned traffic management system using big data to manage the millions of drones that will be in the air in the next decade.
Again the biggest hurdle for drones is regulatory.
Ellman explained that from the beginning the Federal Aviation Administration has treated drones as though they were manned aircraft. To do the kind of inspections GE does with drones, for example, requires the company to obtain waivers from the FAA.
“This is all I do all day, every day, is help general counsel and their teams on these issues,” she added. Ellman heads her firm's unmanned aircraft systems practice group, and co-founded the Commercial Drone Alliance, a nonprofit group that advocates for drone technology.
“There is broad acknowledgement that we need a regulatory framework to operate drones,” Fitzpatrick said. “People have concerns, but there are so many benefits that it's imperative that policymakers get it right, and get it done pretty quickly.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
- 2Bannon's Fraud Trial Delayed One Week as New, 'More Aggressive,' Defense Attorneys Get Ready
- 3'AI-Generated' Case References? This African Law Firm Is Under Investigation
- 4John Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
- 5Why Associates in This Growing Legal Market Are Leaving Their Firms
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250