Health Care Fraud Recovery Dips to $2.6B, Federal Report Shows
Federal agencies recovered more than $2.6 billion in health care fraud and abuse judgments, settlements and impositions in 2017, according to a new annual report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Justice.
April 10, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Department of Justice building in Washington, D.C. Photo Credit: Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Federal agencies recovered more than $2.6 billion in health care fraud and abuse judgments, settlements and other fees in 2017, according to a new government report.
The funds were recovered from prevention and enforcement actions against individuals and organizations engaged in alleged fraud against Medicare and Medicaid and other government programs.
The U.S. Justice Department and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services targeted providers who, among other offenses, operated pill mills out of medical offices and filed false claims for ambulance services and for physical and occupational therapy. In other cases, drug companies were charged with paying kickbacks to medical providers and to pharmacies, and pharmacies were charged for soliciting and accepting kickbacks.
The figure represented a decrease from the $3.3 billion in judgments, settlements and impositions the government said it had recovered in fiscal year 2016, but more than the $2.5 billion recovered in FY 2015. HHS officials said there was a reduction in large monetary settlements from last year because many of the “large pharmaceutical manufacturers have entered into corporate integrity agreements with the HHS office of the inspector general to establish protections against fraudulent activities.”
According to the report for 2017, the Justice Department opened 967 new criminal health care fraud investigations in which federal prosecutors filed criminal charges in 439 cases with 720 defendants, A total of 639 defendants were convicted of health care fraud-related crimes in fiscal year 2017, according to the report.
The DOJ and HHS joint Medicare Fraud Strike Force filed 253 indictments and charges against 478 defendants, who allegedly billed federal health care programs more than $2.3 billion. The strike force obtained more than 290 guilty pleas, litigated 33 jury trials and won guilty verdicts against 40 defendants, and secured prison sentences for more than 300 defendants, with an average sentence of 50 months, according to the HHS news release about the annual report. The Justice Department also opened 948 new civil enforcement cases last year.
“Too many trusted medical professionals like doctors, nurses and pharmacists have chosen to violate their oaths and exploit this generosity to line their pockets, sometimes for millions of dollars,” U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. “At the Department of Justice, we have taken historic new actions to incarcerate these criminals and recover stolen funds, including executing the largest healthcare fraud enforcement action in American history.”
Federal enforcers in July 2017 executed the single largest health care fraud enforcement operation in history, as reported last September in Corporate Counsel. Prosecutors charged 412 defendants, including 115 doctors, nurses and other medical professionals, across the U.S., for allegedly participating in health care fraud schemes involving more than $1.3 billion in false billings. More than 120 defendants were indicted for their alleged roles in prescribing and distributing opioid medications and other narcotics.
Some observers said at the time that the enforcement action indicated a shift of department priorities during the Trump administration toward illicit opioid distribution prosecution and away from white-collar fraud. Sessions announced the formation of the Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit in August.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250