Wells Fargo in Talks With Regulators Seeking $1B in Sanctions
The troubled bank reported in its first quarter financial results that it may be taking another big hit from regulators.
April 13, 2018 at 02:11 PM
4 minute read
Federal regulators are seeking $1 billion in civil penalties from Wells Fargo & Co. for overcharging tens of thousands of customers for improper mortgage fees and unneeded insurance policies, the troubled bank said Friday.
San Francisco-based Wells Fargo reported its preliminary first quarter financial results of $5.9 billion in net income, but said the figure “may have to be revised to reflect additional accruals” for the penalty.
It acknowledged it is in talks with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over the latest sanction, but “cannot reasonably estimate” the loss yet.
Wells Fargo added, “The CFPB and OCC have collectively offered to resolve [the matters] for an aggregate of $1 billion in civil money penalties.” That figure is believed to be a record penalty from the regulators.
Peter Gilchrist, Wells Fargo's corporate communications manager, said the bank would not comment further on the negotiations.
“At this time, we are unable to predict final resolution of the CFPB/OCC matter and cannot reasonably estimate our related loss contingency,” the bank's statement continued. “Accordingly, the preliminary financial results we report today may need to be revised to reflect additional accruals for the CFPB/OCC matter when we file our final financial statements in our quarterly report on form 10-Q with the SEC.”
Chief Executive Officer Tim Sloan said in the statement, “The efforts to build a better Wells Fargo during the quarter included continuing to improve our compliance and operational risk management programs, investing in innovative products and services that enhance the customer experience including the roll-out of our digital mortgage application and predictive banking service, and increasing the minimum hourly pay rate for U.S.- based team members.”
The potentially huge penalty would be the latest in a series of sanctions against the bank as legal and other costs associated with its regulatory problems and related lawsuits continue to hit its bottom line. In the first quarter noninterest expenses were $14.2 billion, down from $16.8 billion in the prior quarter but up 3 percent from a year ago.
Operating losses of $668 million in the first quarter were “elevated due to litigation accruals for a variety of matters, including mortgage-related regulatory investigations, sales practices and other consumer-related matters,” the bank said.
The bank's problems date back to the fall of 2016 when it announced it was paying $185 million in penalties after creating over 3.5 million fake bank accounts using customers' information without their knowledge.
In 2017 alone, Wells Fargo paid $142 million to settle a class action suit over the sham accounts, spent $108 million to settle a whistleblower suit over alleged illegal fees on veterans' loans, agreed to refund fees to 110,000 customers who were wrongly charged for mortgage rate-lock extensions and said it would return $80 million to 570,000 car loan customers who were charged for insurance they did not need. That year, the company also agreed to pay investors $3.4 million for selling them products highly likely to lose money after telling them otherwise and took a $1 billion charge for litigation costs in one quarter.
The problems since 2016 also led to a management shakeup that included a new CEO, general counsel and chief compliance officer, among others.
Back in February, Corporate Counsel reported that Wells Fargo had brought on Sarah Dahlgren, a former executive at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as head of regulatory relations to help work with regulators on the bank's “legal and compliance makeover.”
Sloan said Friday, “I'm confident that our outstanding team will continue to transform Wells Fargo into a better, stronger company; however, we recognize that it will take time to put all of our challenges behind us.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute readJohn Deere Annual Meeting Offers Peek Into DEI Strife That Looms for Companies Nationwide
7 minute readApple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
- 1Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
- 2Disney Legal Chief Sees Pay Surge 36%
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Consilio Launches Legal Privilege Review Tool, Luminance Opens North American Offices, and More
- 4Buchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
- 5A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250