Microsoft Attorney Julie Brill Announces Parent Consent Plan to Comply With GDPR
Microsoft is again offering the public some insights into its plan to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation, which goes into effect in May.
April 16, 2018 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
Unlike some other tech companies, Microsoft Corp. continues to keep the public informed as it takes more steps toward complying with the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation.
Its most recent step, announced last week by deputy general counsel Julie Brill, involved new parental consent requirements for accounts held by children in the EU. Brill, a former Federal Trade Commission commissioner, was hired in April 2017 to lead the company's global privacy and regulatory affairs group and to oversee its compliance with the new law.
In late March, Brill announced the Redmond, Washington-based company had named its first data protection officer, also required by the GDPR, which goes into effect May 25.
Microsoft has made clear announcements about its efforts to comply with the GDPR over the past year, while some other companies, like Google Inc. and Facebook Inc., have made more vague commitments about compliance.
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO and founder of Facebook, for example, has flip-flopped on how much of his company's compliance changes will apply to the United States and other countries outside the EU.
In an April 4 story in the U.K.'s The Guardian newspaper, Zuckerberg refused to commit to using the GDPR as a standard for the social network across the world.
But last week in testimony before U.S. Congress, Zuckerberg said “all the same controls” would be in available in the United States as well as the EU.
Google waited until late March to tell publishers that it would require them to take extra steps to obtain consent from users for the use of Google's ad services, as part of GDPR compliance. Google also wants to be “co-controller” of customer data along with the publishers, which angered some publishers, according to a report in Digiday.
It is not yet clear how Facebook and Google will deal with parental consent requirements under the new law, but Brill spelled out Microsoft's stance.
The GDPR requires parental consent in order for companies to process the personal data of children under the age of 16, but any EU member state can opt to set the age as low as 13. The United States and the U.K. already have laws setting the age at 13. In the United States, that is the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.
Brill's announcement said, “We have already started to roll out the necessary notifications to our users in many EU member states. We will complete the rollout by the end of April.”
When users sign into a Microsoft account, they will be prompted to provide their country and date of birth. Users who are younger than the age of consent for their country will be prompted for parental consent.
Brill said parents can do this either by contacting Microsoft customer service or by using a credit or debit card to pay a 50 cent charge that will be credited toward an existing Microsoft account. After a short grace period, a child's account will be blocked pending parental consent.
“While we appreciate these new GDPR requirements may cause some temporary inconveniences, verifying that an adult is giving their child permission to use an account is an important component of Microsoft's effort to help children explore technology safely,” Brill added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250