Microsoft, Cisco and 32 Other Companies Sign 'Cybersecurity Tech Accord' to Build Global Trust
"By putting ourselves out there in this way, it will result in civil society and other organizations looking for other ways to hold the industry to account, in an age where talk is cheap," Cisco GC Mark Chandler told Corporate Counsel on Tuesday.
April 17, 2018 at 05:05 PM
3 minute read
2018's not even half over yet, but companies have already seen a number of increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks from private and government actors—and customers are noticing.
On Tuesday, 34 tech leaders took a public stance to protect consumers against such attacks, signing the first-ever “Cybersecurity Tech Accord.” The accord aims to increase tech users' trust in innovating companies and increase inter-company collaboration, as stated in four principles outlined here:
- Protect all users and customers everywhere, “irrespective of their technical acumen, culture or location, or the motives of the attacker.”
- Oppose cyberattacks on civilians and enterprises and protect against “tampering with and exploitation of technology products and services during their development, design, distribution and use.” Refuse to help governments launch attacks on innocent users and enterprises.
- Provide tech users with the “information and tools that enable them to understand current and future threats and protect themselves,” and provide governments and NGOs worldwide with the support needed to boost security.
- Work with others in the tech industry to “improve technical collaboration, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, and threat sharing, as well as to minimize the levels of malicious code being introduced into cyberspace.”
In an interview with Corporate Counsel on Tuesday, Cisco Systems Inc. general counsel Mark Chandler, whose company signed the accord, emphasized the importance of the second principle—opposing cyberattacks on innocent citizens and enterprises and not helping governments launch such attacks.
All of the stated principles in the accord are ideas he notes Cisco and many other tech companies have been “living by for years,” but he said they're important to publicly state.
“By putting ourselves out there in this way, it will result in civil society and other organizations looking for other ways to hold the industry to account, in an age where talk is cheap,” Chandler said.
Chandler says he joined the accord after ongoing discussions with Microsoft Corp.
Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith wrote Tuesday that the movement to create the accord began at last year's RSA Conference in San Francisco, when his company called for industry collaboration in creating new measures to protect technology users from cyberattacks.
“We called on the world to borrow a page from history in the form of a Digital Geneva Convention, a long-term goal of updating international law to protect people in times of peace from malicious cyberattacks,” Smith wrote. “But as we also said at RSA last year, the first step in creating a safer internet must come from our own industry, the enterprises that create and operate the world's online technologies and infrastructure.”
Microsoft signed the accord alongside a number of U.S.-based tech companies, including Facebook, LinkedIn, Dell and Oracle, and foreign-based companies such as Madrid-based Telefónica. The accord aims to boost collaboration among these companies and technology, civil society and security researchers to reduce cyberattacks.
“Protecting our online environment is in everyone's interest. The companies that are part of the Cybersecurity Tech Accord promise to defend and advance technology's benefits for society,” Smith wrote. “And we commit to act responsibly, to protect and empower our users and customers, and help create a safer and more secure online world.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent CEO Shooting Tragedy a Reminder for Corporate Risk Assessment and Incident Response Plans
7 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Judge Sides With McDonald's In Attorney-Client Privilege Dispute With Former Executives
4 minute read'Climate-Smart Beef'?: DC Lawsuit Accuses Tyson Foods of False Advertising
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250