Singapore GCs Eyeing Higher Impact, Chief Executive Roles, Report Finds
General counsel in the city-state seem to be an ambitious bunch—and may have their eyes on the CEO or COO's chair.
April 19, 2018 at 04:46 PM
3 minute read
Singapore skyline. Unlimited RF.
Singapore-based GCs are seeing the fruits of their labor more than they did five years ago, according to a new report.
In their first joint Singapore General Counsel Report, global law firm CMS and the Singapore Corporate Counsel Association revealed that 18 percent of general counsel respondents in Singapore said they think their current work is having the greatest strategic value to their business.
This group said their influence among senior leaders is “very strong,” while another 60 percent of GCs said it is “strong.”
This is up from five years ago, when only 34 percent of GCs in Singapore felt their influence was “strong,” and only 5 percent believed their impact was “very strong.”
Moving forward, about 52 percent expect to be doing work of the highest level of strategic influence in the next five years.
“General counsel in Singapore have much in common with their counterparts elsewhere,” said the report, which was released on Wednesday. “Many of the findings mirror very closely what we've heard from GCs in Europe. That's not surprising in a business world that continues to embrace globalization.”
Some 60 percent of GCs felt that their influence within the boardroom was “strong,” and another 18 percent said it was “very strong.”
While this growing impact is promising for general counsel in Singapore, most GCs are looking to be even more involved in company strategy. In fact, nearly 20 percent of GCs surveyed said they intend to become a chief executive officer or chief operating officer someday.
According to the report, only about two-thirds of GCs plan to spend their whole career in the general counsel role.
The report also asked some of Singapore's in-house lawyers about goals and challenges on the job.
Among them was Rose Kong, head of legal at RGE. She said, “Measuring lawyers' contribution is still an issue with management. They struggle to grade us. Much of our work is subjective, but for them contribution is basically dollars. Some would like it if we did time sheets to benchmark our worth—and yet they like alternative fee arrangements with external lawyers. There's a disconnect there. It's hard to solve.”
Despite challenges ahead, “as a class, GCs are much more numerous, more influential and better respected than ever,” said Jonathan Warne, CMS' head of litigation and arbitration and lead partner on the firm's GC program. “The report clearly reflects the ambition and opportunities for GCs operating across the Asia-Pacific region.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLooming Legal Threats, the Murdochs' Influence Make Fox CLO Vacancy Both Alluring and Terrifying
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250