What Peabody Energy's GC Expects From Outside Counsel
Peabody's chief legal officer Verona Dorch and one of her outside firm partners, Joe Glynias of Husch Blackwell, told Corporate Counsel how the firm made it on to the energy company's latest panel, and how they've used the opportunity to work together in new and interesting ways.
April 20, 2018 at 05:43 PM
4 minute read
Joe Glynias of Husch Blackwell, left, and Verona Dorch of Peabody Energy, right. Courtesy photos.
Peabody Energy Corp. and Husch Blackwell have been working together for well over a decade. But that didn't mean the firm was a shoo-in when Peabody's legal chief issued a request for proposals last year as part of the process of building a new panel of outside firms.
Peabody's chief legal officer Verona Dorch, who leads a department of 35 legal and government affairs professionals, had a certain set of criteria in mind when the St. Louis-based company examined various law firms throughout the country—and she expected every firm to take those expectations seriously.
After a process that spanned several months over the course of 2017, Peabody ultimately chose 13 firms, including Husch, to work as strategic partners. Not every firm that previously counted Peabody as a client was asked to continue their relationship.
“We had to have some very tough conversations with longtime firms,” Dorch said. “It was uncomfortable, but we gave them feedback on what we were looking for, in case they want to re-enter the process next time.”
Among the “lucky 13” firms, as Dorch jokingly described the group, was a mix of both new firms and those that have served as outside counsel for some time.
Peabody's legal department turned to AdvanceLaw, a legal management consultancy, for help throughout the process. “We only go through this process every two to three years, so it's nice to have a partner that has the knowledge,” Dorch said. “Plus, it was able to free up our lawyers so they could work on other things.”
Dorch said during the RFP she was looking for firms that “really listened” to the company and paid attention to its needs. If a firm has the right practice area specialty for Peabody, she noted, that's helpful—but it's certainly not everything.
Her advice for firms participating in an RFP process: “Really read those RFPs and follow through. … Don't assume, 'Oh, diversity. That's not a big deal. We can deliver on these other five areas.'”
Dorch explained that Peabody was interested in having firms on board that are flexible with fee arrangements. Though she believes there's still a place for hourly billing on some types of matters, she also favors making good use of AFAs.
With securities work, for instance, she likes flat fees. “For that, you know exactly what you're doing every year with Ks and Qs and proxies,” Dorch said.
For Husch, winning a spot on Peabody's panel has provided new opportunities, beyond more business for the firm. Joe Glynias, a Husch partner, said the experience has meant a chance for Peabody and Husch to build even more on their relationship and collaborate.
For instance, at the beginning of this year, one of Peabody's in-house lawyers left for another job. Since the legal department has been down by one lawyer in the past few months, Dorch called on a lawyer from Husch to come in on secondment, so the company could work with someone who already knew the business and hold off on recruiting someone new until after it got through the proxy season.
Glynias said that in working with any company, outside lawyers should know that client's business inside and out.
His advice for lawyers is to sit in on investor calls, set up Google alerts about the company and stay on top of news regarding the company's affairs, legal or not.
“If there's a catastrophe at a facility in New Hampshire, you need to know about it,” Glynias said. “It's not just about providing legal assistance on those everyday matters. You can become a trusted partner for the business.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGoogle Fails to Secure Long-Term Stay of Order Requiring It to Open App Store to Rivals
'Am I Spending Time in the Right Place?' SPX Technologies CLO Cherée Johnson on Living and Leading With Intent
9 minute read'It Was the Next Graduation': How an In-House Lawyer Became a Serial Entrepreneur
9 minute readRenee Meisel, GC of UnitedLex, on Understanding and Growing the Business
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250