US Trade Representative's Office Finds Weak IP Protection Regimes in China (and Canada?)
The USTR's latest "Priority Watch List" for IP rights featured both perennial members and new surprises.
April 30, 2018 at 05:09 PM
3 minute read
Shutterstock.com
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has released a report warning companies and other intellectual property holders about countries that it says come up short in regard to IP protection and enforcement. China has made the list of the most problematic countries once again—and in a move that may come as a surprise, Canada has been added for the first time.
For the 14th year in a row, China has been placed on the USTR's “Priority Watch List” as part of the office's annual Special 301 Report, released April 27. The USTR cited China's record of failing to crack down on the manufacture and sale of counterfeit goods and its lack of laws to prevent trade secret theft.
According to the report, in 2014, the Chinese State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC), a national corporate regulator, reported that 40 percent of goods it purchased online were “not genuine,” which is a classification the organization used to describe counterfeit products.
The report also cited technology transfer requirements that the USTR said are used as a condition to access Chinese markets, as well as the “mandatory application of adverse terms to foreign IP licensors.”
“Assertions by Chinese government officials that China's shortcomings should be excused in light of the country's stage of economic development appear to suggest an underlying lack of commitment to address longstanding problems and undermine any confidence stemming from positive developments and high level statements in support of IP and innovation,” the USTR report said.
The office said in the announcement of the report's release that the 12 countries on the Priority Watch List, including China, will be subject to “intense bilateral engagement” over the next year.
After China on the priority watch list were Indonesia, India, Algeria, Kuwait, Ukraine, Argentina, Canada, Chile, Colombia and Venezuela.
Canada is the only G7 country this year to move from the Watch List to the Priority Watch list. The report states that Canada was downgraded because of “poor border enforcement generally” and lack of a customs authority to “inspect or detain suspected counterfeit or pirated goods shipped through Canada.”
The report further states that in 2017 there were no known criminal prosecutions for counterfeiting in Canada, which makes it a “striking outlier” among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. The report also cites U.S. concern over proposed changes to Canada's Patented Medicine Prices Review Board that would “fail to appropriately recognize the value of innovative medicines in both the private and public markets.”
On the second-tier Watch List were Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Greece, Romania, Switzerland, Turkey, Mexico, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Barbados, Jamaica, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru. The report says that IP challenges in those countries merit additional bilateral engagement over the next year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 2The Definition of Special Employment
- 3People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 4Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 5Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250