Law Departments Are Seeing More Class Actions, No New Staff to Manage Them, Survey Says
The 2018 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey indicated that in-house legal departments have to deal with more class actions than before, but aren't getting a corresponding increase in staff devoted to these types of matters.
May 03, 2018 at 04:46 PM
3 minute read
Credit: Carlton Fields
Class action litigation spending is on the rise, according to a new survey, and legal departments need to strategize to manage these types of lawsuits.
The 2018 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey, which draws on insight from about 400 in-house counsel across various industries, showed the number of respondent companies facing class actions rose to 59 percent in 2017, up from 53.8 percent the year prior.
Collectively, companies spent more than $2.2 billion defending class action lawsuits last year, according to the survey, which indicated these suits comprised 11.4 percent of all litigation in the United States.
The most common types of class actions were in the labor and employment space, which accounted for 21.6 percent of class action spending. The next highest number of class actions were related to consumer fraud, which accounted for 18.9 percent.
Meanwhile, companies also saw an increase in products liability and antitrust class actions last year.
Though the workload is up, most companies are still relying on roughly the same number of in-house attorneys to work on class actions as they had to handle these matters previously. The companies included in the survey relied on fewer than four in-house attorneys for that type of work—which was actually a slight drop in staffing from previous years.
“As a result, reliance on outside counsel increased, as did the number of hours that each dedicated in-house attorney spent managing class actions,” the survey noted.
The survey said that most companies continued to rely on early case assessment, with 78.2 percent of companies considering outside counsel's involvement in early case assessment to be substantial or essential, up from 73.1 percent the year prior.
As for what is requested of outside counsel in early case assessment, 71.7 percent are being asked to examine case facts, 39.6 percent are asked to calculate potential exposure, and 26.4 percent each are being asked to develop strategy and determine the likelihood of certification.
Another 15.1 percent of companies reported they are asking outside counsel to estimate the cost of litigation, and 11.3 percent are being tasked with document gathering and review and considering the jurisdiction and jury, respectively.
And, according to the survey, fewer companies are relying solely on one individual to achieve positive class action outcomes. About 51.6 percent of companies assigned one individual to a class action last year, which is down from 62.2 percent in 2016. The main benefit for holding one individual accountable is consistency in approach, respondents said.
“Although companies report an increased volume and complexity of pending class actions, their class action defense philosophies remained relatively steady,” the survey stated.
About 11.3 percent of companies reported they have a “defend at all costs” philosophy, down slightly from 13.2 percent the previous year. The “defend at the right cost/assess each case separately” philosophy was also down from 43.4 percent to 39.6 percent. Meanwhile, 20.8 percent reported taking “an aggressive stance,” compared to 17 percent in 2016. And the “go low,” or lowest cost strategy, was also up from 26.4 percent in 2016 to 28.3 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readFTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
6 minute readPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250