Sourcing Your Next Great Hire
Every general counsel understands the importance of hiring the right people. Take your time. And do your best to take control of the process.
May 03, 2018 at 11:21 AM
3 minute read
Attention general counsel: When you have an opening to fill, are you sure that the person you really want to hire even knows you are hiring?
While there will always be more attorneys seeking in-house positions than there are openings, sourcing a great hire is more challenging than ever for several reasons:
- Unemployment among attorneys with in-house experience is historically low.
- Desirable candidates are busier than ever and therefore less likely to be monitoring job boards.
- Internal recruiters in your HR department struggle when asked to identify and proactively contact the right currently employed prospects.
- Your company may be highly resistant to using a search firm for openings below the C-suite level due to HR policies controlling those engagements.
To clarify, this month's advice is not about the vetting process. Whether or not you use a search firm to add its judgment and advice, ultimately you have to make the selection. Vetting is not nearly as nuanced or challenging as others in my line of work want you to believe. Winners reveal themselves and become obvious to everyone.
If you are not seeing winners who match what you need in a critical hire, don't settle. My self-serving, but I believe correct, advice is to use a legal search firm. This may require a political battle with your colleagues in HR. If your CEO will allow it, though, the easier path is to simply pay for the recruiter from your law department budget and take ownership of the engagement.
Make no mistake: A search firm is your best option for getting access to so-called passive candidates, the ones who otherwise would not be aware of your opening. Proactive and expert sourcing is the most important part of a search firm's value proposition.
If search firm use is simply not going to happen for you, here are two other suggestions for improving your access to winners:
- Consider hiring from the ranks of your best outside law firms when possible. While this means forgoing someone with in-house experience, you likely know who you value. And you may even be able to lure someone over to start out on a secondment basis to see if the fit is right.
- Invest your own time and take a DIY approach. Don't just rely on your internal recruiter. Post the opening on your LinkedIn news feed. Email the opening to your contact network. I know one general counsel who even offered her company's skybox for a concert as a thank you for a winning candidate referral.
Every general counsel understands the importance of hiring the right people.
Take your time. And do your best to take control of the process.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250