The AI Tech That's Saving Walmart's In-House Lawyers Time
Alan Bryan, Walmart's senior associate GC of legal operations and outside counsel management, told Corporate Counsel how the new technology is really making a difference.
May 07, 2018 at 01:56 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
Walmart Inc.'s litigators have found a way to reduce the time spent on answers and initial discovery dramatically—by about 60 to 80 percent.
That's according to Alan Bryan, Walmart's senior associate GC of legal operations and outside counsel management, who is championing a new artificial intelligence tool, LegalMation, on behalf of the Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer's legal department.
Walmart said the technology is automated to create first drafts of answers to litigation and to draft the initial round of discovery requests, each in about two minutes. This could equate to shaving off 10 hours of attorney time on each lawsuit, according to LegalMation's estimates.
“This has and will continue to help our internal and external attorneys focus more time on higher level strategic legal concerns,” Bryan said in an email interview.
Walmart began a pilot in the second half of 2017 with LegalMation's technology restricted by subject matter and jurisdiction.
“Due to the success of the pilot, Walmart has worked with LegalMation to expand,” Bryan said.
So far, LegalMation is available only in California—with Texas and Florida next in the queue—but Walmart's Bryan said that “this process will continue to expand as we utilize LegalMation in a great number of jurisdictions.”
Bryan estimated that Walmart's attorneys can reduce time spent on answers and initial discovery by 60 to 80 percent, depending on the matter.
He said that Walmart hasn't changed any technology systems as a result of rolling out LegalMation, but the department did make a “change to the process in which we assign certain lawsuits to include drafts created by LegalMation, and we hope it will give time back to our outside counsel to think innovatively.”
As for the biggest benefits for Walmart, Bryan cited cost savings, in addition to “uniformity in pleadings and discovery.”
Walmart is the first company to publicly announce a partnership with LegalMation, but weeks after its April 4 announcement, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart came on board to leverage the AI technology for its clients. LegalMation co-founder and CEO James Lee said several other companies are testing out the AI tool in its current production phase.
Lee, a former lawyer in private practice, said most lawyers are asked to do stuff they don't like. “They didn't go to law school to write discovery requests,” Lee said. “That's one of the most unpleasing parts of the job. I'm glad we're able to use AI to start doing a lot of that work.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readElaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250